[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54727D03.4090909@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:34:11 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] sched: test the cpu's capacity in wake affine
Hi Vincent,
On 5/28/14, 7:15 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 28 May 2014 12:58, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 05:53:03PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
[snip]
>> Now I'm only struggling to understand the rationale for this, its got
>> LLC in there somewhere, but I'm failing to comprehend.
> Ah.. i have probably overestimated the fact that wake_affine was only
> done at MC or SMT level but after reading more deeply the glags
> configuration of all sched_domain level , my assumption is not true.
What's level the wake_affine should happen?
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
> So I need to test sd flag to make sure that their share their cache at
> this level
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists