[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW8gAiyFiPHu-N4Dg_+b6Qg9JXZZ3PqOn=VmZLcEH-Xkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 09:38:20 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: Pieter Smith <pieter@...sman.nl>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, beber@...eeweb.net,
catalina.mocanu@...il.com, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
iulia.manda21@...il.com, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
bfields@...ldses.org, jlayton@...chiereds.net,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Paul.Durrant@...rix.com,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Foley <pefoley2@...oley.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
willemb@...gle.com, xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
zhenglong.cai@...c.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] kernel tinification: optionally compile out splice
family of syscalls (splice, vmsplice, tee and sendfile)
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 09:30:40PM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:43:26AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 01:46:23PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> > > Truly removing sendfile/sendpage means that you can't even compile NFS
>> > > into the tree.
>> >
>> > If you mean the in-kernel nfsd (CONFIG_NFSD), that already has a large
>> > stack of "select" and "depends on", both directly and indirectly; adding
>> > a "select SPLICE_SYSCALL" to it seems fine. (That select does need
>> > adding, though. Pieter, you need to test-compile more than just
>> > tinyconfig and defconfig. Try an allyesconfig with *just* splice turned
>> > off, and make sure that compiles.)
>>
>> Did exacly that. Took forever on my hardware, but no problems.
>
> Ah, I see. Looking more closely at nfsd, it looks like it already has a
> code path for filesystems that don't do splice. I think, rather than
> making nfsd select SPLICE_SYSCALL, that it would suffice to change the
> "rqstp->rq_splice_ok = true;" in svc_process_common (net/sunrpc/svc.c)
> to:
>
> rqstp->rq_splice_ok = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPLICE_SYSCALL);
>
> Then nfsd should simply *always* fall back to its non-splice support.
Hence I suggest adding to the nfsd help text:
While nfsd works without SPLICE_SYSCALL, you may want to enable
SPLICE_SYSCALL for <...> (performance?) reasons.
(Hmm, does Kconfig need a "suggests", cfr. Debian package dependencies?)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists