lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:20:08 +0100
From:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To:	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, kgene.kim@...sung.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] exynos: Move pmu driver to driver/soc folder and
 add exynos7 support


Hi,

On Monday, November 24, 2014 07:36:10 AM Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This patch series [1 - 5] performs,
> 
> 1) Moves pmu driver to driver/soc/samsung folder. This is needed as exynos7 is
>    an arm64 based platform and hence PMU driver should be in driver folder.
>    Some discussion happened about this in the v1 version. Finally adding it in
>    driver/soc folder as it too SoC specific and not a general driver.
>    Entire discussion can be found here (A).
> 2) Add exynos7 PMU support.

Some months ago (when the work on moving PMU driver out of mach-exynos
started) I asked how much code would be shared between arm32 and arm64
SoCs.  Now it seems that the code in question is minimal so I still
wonder whether it is really worth to have a common driver (please note
that in case of arm32 kernel all arm64 PMU code is just a dead code,
similarly for arm64 kernel and arm32 PMU code).  Would it be possible
to do the analysis of the additional source code needed vs saved code
in the resulting binary for the case of having separate drivers?

Could you also please take a look into fixing patch #4 to be compatible
with http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1407.1/00298.html ?
(It seems that just adding separate struct exynos_pmu_conf_extra for
->pmu_config_extra shold be okay.)

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

> 3) Enables the driver for 32bit arm exynos platforms.
> 
> Changes from V3:
> * Fixed Kconfig as per Russell feedback
> * Rebased the series against Pankaj SoC restart consolidation patches (D) as per
>   Kukjin request.
> * Link to V3 can be found here (C)
> 
> Changes from V2:
> * Added review comment changes suggested by Pankaj.
> * Removed mfd client support in this patch series. This will be added later in
>   the power domain patch series.
> * Link to V2 can be found here (B)
> 
> Changes from V1:
> * Move pmu driver in driver/soc/samsung folder
> * Removed the power domain features. They will posted as a separate series.
> * Added exynos7 PMU support.
> * Link to v1 can be found here (A)
> 
> This complete patch series is rebased on Kukjin for-next tree.
> 
> (A) - http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg38442.html
> (B) - http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg375910.html
> (C) - http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg39237.html 
> (D) - http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg39095.html
> 
> Amit Daniel Kachhap (5):
>   ARM: EXYNOS: Move pmu specific header files under "linux/soc/samsung"
>   drivers: soc: Add support for Exynos PMU driver
>   driver: soc: exynos-pmu: Add an API to be called after wakeup
>   drivers: soc: exynos-pmu: Add support for Exynos7
>   arm: exynos: Select SOC_SAMSUNG config option
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt        |    1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig                       |    1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile                      |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c                      |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c                 |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c                     |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c                          |    4 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c                     |    4 +-
>  drivers/soc/Kconfig                                |    1 +
>  drivers/soc/Makefile                               |    1 +
>  drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig                        |   20 +
>  drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile                       |    1 +
>  .../pmu.c => drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c      |  442 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  .../linux/soc/samsung}/exynos-pmu.h                |    1 +
>  .../linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h            |  273 ++++++++++++
>  15 files changed, 744 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
>  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
>  rename arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c => drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c (64%)
>  rename {arch/arm/mach-exynos => include/linux/soc/samsung}/exynos-pmu.h (89%)
>  rename arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h => include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h (63%)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ