[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5473368C.5040409@6wind.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:45:48 +0100
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, stephen@...workplumber.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...capital.net,
cwang@...pensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/4] netns: allow to identify peer netns
Le 30/10/2014 19:41, Eric W. Biederman a écrit :
> Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> writes:
>
>> The goal of this serie is to be able to multicast netlink messages with an
>> attribute that identify a peer netns.
>> This is needed by the userland to interpret some informations contained in
>> netlink messages (like IFLA_LINK value, but also some other attributes in case
>> of x-netns netdevice (see also
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/315933/focus=316064 and
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/28301/focus=4239)).
>>
>> Ids of peer netns are set by userland via a new genl messages. These ids are
>> stored per netns and are local (ie only valid in the netns where they are set).
>> To avoid allocating an int for each peer netns, I use idr_for_each() to retrieve
>> the id of a peer netns. Note that it will be possible to add a table (struct net
>> -> id) later to optimize this lookup if needed.
>>
>> Patch 1/4 introduces the netlink API mechanism to set and get these ids.
>> Patch 2/4 and 3/4 implements an example of how to use these ids in rtnetlink
>> messages. And patch 4/4 shows that the netlink messages can be symetric between
>> a GET and a SET.
>>
>> iproute2 patches are available, I can send them on demand.
>
> A quick reply. I think this patchset is in the right general direction.
> There are some oddball details that seem odd/awkward to me such as using
> genetlink instead of rtnetlink to get and set the ids, and not having
> ids if they are not set (that feels like a maintenance/usability challenge).
>
> I would like to give your patches a deep review, but I won't be able to
> do that for a couple of weeks. I am deep in the process of moving,
> and will be mostly offline until about the Nov 11th.
Eric, did you have a chance to look at this?
Regards,
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists