linux-kernel - [PATCH V3 02/11] irqchip: brcmstb-l2: don't clear wakeable interrupts at init time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1416796846-28149-3-git-send-email-cernekee@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:40:37 -0800
From:	Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
To:	ralf@...ux-mips.org
Cc:	f.fainelli@...il.com, jfraser@...adcom.com, dtor@...omium.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net, jogo@...nwrt.org,
	arnd@...db.de, computersforpeace@...il.com,
	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 02/11] irqchip: brcmstb-l2: don't clear wakeable interrupts at init time

From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>

Wakeable interrupts might be pending at boot/init time, because wakeup
interrupts might have triggered a resume from S5. So don't clear such
wakeups.

This means that any driver which requests a wakeable interrupt bit
should be prepared to handle an interrupt as soon as they call
request_irq(). (This is technically already the correct development
practice, but some drivers probably expect not to receive interrupts
until they have performed some I/O.)

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
index 4aa653a0ac72..4edd27c486c4 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
@@ -136,7 +136,11 @@ int __init brcmstb_l2_intc_of_init(struct device_node *np,
 
 	/* Disable all interrupts by default */
 	writel(0xffffffff, data->base + CPU_MASK_SET);
-	writel(0xffffffff, data->base + CPU_CLEAR);
+
+	/* Wakeup interrupts may be retained from S5 (cold boot) */
+	data->can_wake = of_property_read_bool(np, "brcm,irq-can-wake");
+	if (!data->can_wake)
+		writel(0xffffffff, data->base + CPU_CLEAR);
 
 	data->parent_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
 	if (data->parent_irq < 0) {
@@ -188,8 +192,7 @@ int __init brcmstb_l2_intc_of_init(struct device_node *np,
 	ct->chip.irq_suspend = brcmstb_l2_intc_suspend;
 	ct->chip.irq_resume = brcmstb_l2_intc_resume;
 
-	if (of_property_read_bool(np, "brcm,irq-can-wake")) {
-		data->can_wake = true;
+	if (data->can_wake) {
 		/* This IRQ chip can wake the system, set all child interrupts
 		 * in wake_enabled mask
 		 */
-- 
2.1.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/