[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26417.1416840116@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:41:56 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, mmarek@...e.cz, d.kasatkin@...sung.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, vgoyal@...hat.com, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] PKCS#7: Allow detached data to be supplied for signature checking purposes
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > Ok, PCKS#7 supports detached data. I assume this is not needed for
> > > kernel modules. What is the motivation for adding this support to the
> > > kernel?
> >
> > See patch #5. I should probably note that in the commit message.
>
> This patch set does not change the syscall. The signature is still
> appended to the kernel module.
Ummm, yes, so?
> In fact, the call from kernel/module_signing.c: mod_verify_pkcs7() calls
> pkcs7_supply_detached_data() with a pointer to the module and the module
> length to set the data field. pkcs7_supply_detached_data() would not be
> defined or exported, unless it was going to be called elsewhere. How else
> are you planning on using pkcs7_supply_detached_data()?
Is your point that I exported it unnecessarily? That I have now fixed.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists