[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141124151527.GC7712@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:15:27 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@...onic-design.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] devicetree: add a binding for a regulator that
constrains its supply
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:02:00PM +0100, Alban Bedel wrote:
> +Constrained Supply Regulator
> +
> +This binding allow creating a virtual regulator that constrain its
> +supply to provides the requested voltage. This is to allow using
> +simple drivers that don't explicitly request a voltage on boards
> +that have adjustable hardware regulators.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : Must be "regulator-constrained-supply".
> +- vin-supply : phandle to the parent supply/regulator node
Reading this description I'm at a loss to explain what this is intended
to achieve - it's obviously not describing hardware which is a rather
large alarm bell and I don't really understand why the constraints
wouldn't be set on the parent regulator.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists