[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141124180422.GO7712@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:04:22 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@...onic-design.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] devicetree: add a binding for a regulator that
constrains its supply
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 06:12:33PM +0100, Alban Bedel wrote:
> Using this driver the DTS for the add-on board can further constrain
> this supply to get the voltage it need, for example 3.3V. I understand
> I saw 3 ways to solve this problem:
> 1) This, use a "filter" regulator
> 2) Extend each and every driver that use a voltage regulator to
> optionally set the voltage
> 3) Include the required range in the phandle reference
> #1 was the easiest :) #2 doesn't seems practical to me, #3 seems pretty
> good but I'm really not sure if that would be acceptable.
The DT overlay for the add on board should be setting the constraints
for the parent regulator. I wouldn't expect the final DT to look any
different to how it looks with no hardware modularity unless the actual
module is interesting enough to have a driver of its own.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists