linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv10 2/5] x86: Hook up execveat system call.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHse=S-DS=NGC619Uhzkbd-EKa0D+HgBq3rE1czmLdoxAFswPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:26:24 +0000
From:	David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Meredydd Luff <meredydd@...atehouse.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 2/5] x86: Hook up execveat system call.

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:53:56AM +0000, David Drysdale wrote:
>> Hook up x86-64, i386 and x32 ABIs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>
>
> This one has been breaking my linux-next build for the past week.  I'm
> not sure what's going on.

Hi Dan,

Sorry if this has been causing you problems -- I've not had any
errors from the kbuild robots or my local builds.

> I build with a script:
>
> make allmodconfig
>
> cat << EOF >> .config
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=n
> CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS=n
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y
> EOF
>
> make oldconfig
>
> Here are the errors:
>
>   CHK     include/generated/compile.h
>   CHECK   arch/x86/ia32/audit.c
>   CC      arch/x86/ia32/audit.o
> arch/x86/ia32/audit.c: In function ‘ia32_classify_syscall’:
> arch/x86/ia32/audit.c:38:7: error: ‘__NR_execveat’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> arch/x86/ia32/audit.c:38:7: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/ia32/audit.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Target `__build' not remade because of errors.
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/ia32] Error 2
>   CHECK   arch/x86/kernel/audit_64.c
>   CHK     kernel/config_data.h
>   CC      arch/x86/kernel/audit_64.o
> arch/x86/kernel/audit_64.c: In function ‘audit_classify_syscall’:
> arch/x86/kernel/audit_64.c:53:7: error: ‘__NR_execveat’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> arch/x86/kernel/audit_64.c:53:7: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/audit_64.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Target `__build' not remade because of errors.
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
> make[1]: Target `__build' not remade because of errors.

That seems odd -- the generic definition of __NR_execveat is in the first
patch in the series, and the various x86-specific definitions should get
generated from the table entries in the second patch in the series (at
least since the v9 set I sent on 19 Nov, which split out the x86 wiring
from the general implementation).

Are the syscall table generation steps happening in your build?  And does
__NR_execveat appear in the various generated x86 unistd*.h headers?

As an aside, I've just built next-20141124 (a4cfa44aa26a) fine from
scratch with your config steps.   The build output included the header
generation steps:

  SYSTBL  arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/asm/syscalls_32.h
  SYSHDR  arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/asm/unistd_32_ia32.h
  SYSHDR  arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/asm/unistd_64_x32.h
  SYSTBL  arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h
  SYSHDR  arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h
  HOSTCC  scripts/basic/bin2c
  SYSHDR  arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h
  SYSHDR  arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_x32.h

and the resulting files did include the __NR_execveat constant:

  % grep execveat usr/include/asm*/*.h arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/*.h
  usr/include/asm-generic/unistd.h:#define __NR_execveat 281
  usr/include/asm-generic/unistd.h:__SC_COMP(__NR_execveat,
sys_execveat, compat_sys_execveat)
  usr/include/asm/unistd_32.h:#define __NR_execveat 358
  usr/include/asm/unistd_64.h:#define __NR_execveat 322
  usr/include/asm/unistd_x32.h:#define __NR_execveat (__X32_SYSCALL_BIT + 545)
  arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h:#define __NR_execveat 358
  arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h:#define __NR_execveat 322
  arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_x32.h:#define
__NR_execveat (__X32_SYSCALL_BIT + 545)

So I can't (yet) reproduce your problem I'm afraid...

> regards,
> dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/