[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141124202214.GA11362@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:22:14 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: josh@...htriplett.org
Cc: Pieter Smith <pieter@...sman.nl>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Bertrand Jacquin <beber@...eeweb.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
蔡正龙 <zhenglong.cai@...c.com.cn>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Peter Foley <pefoley2@...oley.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
"open list:FUSE: FILESYSTEM..." <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
Catalina Mocanu <catalina.mocanu@...il.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Iulia Manda <iulia.manda21@...il.com>,
"open list:ABI/API" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:14:50PM -0800, josh@...htriplett.org wrote:
> > I would, again, argue that stuff like __splice_p() not be implemented at
> > all please. It will only cause a huge proliferation of stuff like this
> > that will not make any sense, and only cause a trivial, if any, amount
> > of code savings.
> >
> > I thought you were going to not do this type of thing until you got the
> > gcc optimizer working for function callbacks.
>
> Compared to the previous patchset, there are now only two instances of
> ifdefs outside of the splice code for this, and this is one of them. In
> this case, the issue is no longer about making the code for this
> splice_read function disappear, but rather to eliminate a reference to a
> bit of splice functionality (used *inside* the FUSE splice code) that
> will not work without SPLICE_SYSCALL.
>
> Would you prefer to see this specific case handled via an #ifdef in
> fs/fuse/dev.c rather than introducing a __splice_p that people might be
> inclined to propagate? That'd be fine; the code could simply wrap
> fuse_dev_splice_read in an #ifdef and have the #else define a NULL
> fuse_dev_splice_read.
Yes, I would prefer that, but I'm not the fuse maintainer.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists