lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1416803012.2669.68.camel@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 23 Nov 2014 20:23:32 -0800
From:	Adam Williamson <awilliam@...hat.com>
To:	"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
	lenb@...nel.org, wsa@...-dreams.de, robert.moore@...el.com,
	lv.zheng@...el.com, shigorin@...il.com, jan.brummer@...os.org,
	mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...ica.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] ACPI: Add _DEP(Operation Region Dependencies)
 support to fix battery issue on the Asus T100TA

On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 10:39 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/11/23 21:22, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> > ACPI 5.0 introduces _DEP to designate device objects that OSPM should
> > assign a higher priority in start ordering due to future operation region
> > accesses.
> > 
> > On Asus T100TA, ACPI battery info are read from a I2C slave device via
> > I2C operation region. Before I2C operation region handler is installed,
> > battery _STA always returns 0. There is a _DEP method of designating
> > start order under battery device node.
> > 
> > This patch is to implement _DEP feature to fix battery issue on the Asus T100TA.
> > Introducing acpi_dep_list and adding dep_unmet count in the struct
> > acpi_device. During ACPI namespace scan, create struct acpi_dep_data for a
> > valid pair of master (device pointed to by _DEP)/slave(device with _DEP), record
> > master's and slave's ACPI handle in it and put it into acpi_dep_list. The dep_unmet
> > count will increase by one if there is a device under its _DEP. Driver's probe() should
> > return EPROBE_DEFER when find dep_unmet is larger than 0. When I2C operation
> > region handler is installed, remove all struct acpi_dep_data on the acpi_dep_list
> > whose master is pointed to I2C host controller and decrease slave's dep_unmet.
> > When dep_unmet decreases to 0, all _DEP conditions are met and then do acpi_bus_attach()
> > for the device in order to resolve battery _STA issue on the Asus T100TA.
> 
> Well, Can we explicitly tied this up with ASUS T100TA in the code?
> If I understand correctly, the assumption in the patch is that the
> battery device only depends on I2C device, which is true on ASUS T100TA,
> but may not on the other platforms.
> 
> This patch does not work on a box I have, on it _DEP contains I2C and GPIO.
> 
> Device (BATC)
>         {
>             Name (_HID, EisaId ("PNP0C0A"))  // _HID: Hardware ID
> --------snip--------
>             Name (_DEP, Package (0x03)  // _DEP: Dependencies
>             {
>                 I2C1,
>                 GPO2,
>                 GPO0
>             })
> 
> Thanks,
> -Aubrey

It certainly works for more than *just* the T100 - fedlet users have
reported working battery status on at least the Miix 2 and Venue 8 Pro
(I can personally confirm it works on the Venue 8 Pro). However, Bastien
Nocera reported failure on an Onda v975w with a slightly earlier version
of the patch in the bug report -
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69011#c58 , "Tested with the
same patch on a Onda v975w, and it tries very hard to detect the battery
but fails."
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ