[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201411242327.13398@pali>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:27:13 +0100
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible
On Friday 05 September 2014 15:58:34 Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Pali Rohár
<pali.rohar@...il.com> wrote:
> > So what is your suggestion for identifing board (name/type)
> > which will work with any kernel (and will not be broken
> > again by kernel later)?
>
> $ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/machine
> Freescale i.MX6 Quad SABRE Smart Device Board
This output is on Nokia N900 useless:
$ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/machine
OMAP3430/3530
It does not specify that this is Nokia N900 (RX-51) device but
only some generic omap board.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists