[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5474C255.6020703@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:54:29 +0000
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/deadline: fix pull if dl task who's prio changed
is not on queue
Hi,
On 19/11/14 08:35, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Dl task who is not on queue and it is also the curr task simultaneously
> can not happen. In addition, pull since the priority of a not on queue
> dl task doesn't make any sense.
>
> This patch fix it by don't pull if dl task who's prio changed is not on
> queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index b9e44ae..4eaf55c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1678,7 +1678,10 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> int oldprio)
> {
> - if (task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->curr == p) {
> + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
> + return;
> +
> + if (rq->curr == p) {
Yeah. I already posted a patches for this, that I forgot to properly
post again :/. I'll do it soon.
Thanks,
- Juri
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /*
> * This might be too much, but unfortunately
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists