[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1416940024.26209.2.camel@linux-t7sj.site>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:27:04 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, corbet@....net,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org,
riel@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, mgorman@...e.de, liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
raistlin@...ux.it, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
atomlin@...hat.com, avagin@...nvz.org, gorcunov@...nvz.org,
serge.hallyn@...onical.com, athorlton@....com, oleg@...hat.com,
vdavydov@...allels.com, daeseok.youn@...il.com,
keescook@...omium.org, yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
sbauer@....utah.edu, vishnu.ps@...sung.com, axboe@...com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/fair: Add advisory flag for borrowing a
timeslice
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 07:45 -0700, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> This solution has been used by both database and java on other OSs and
> has shown performance improvement. Andrew had asked for performance
> numbers on Linux with this patch last time I sent this out and it took
> me a while to get performance folks to run a full TPC-C workload. They
> did see a 3% improvement in tpcc as I noted in commit log and that is a
> significant improvement.
3% for such a change seems pretty worthless... I would have expected
this having to impact performance much more.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists