[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5474CAC6.8030608@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:30:30 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Patrick Titiano <ptitiano@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] hwmon: ina2xx: bail-out from ina2xx_probe() in case
of configuration errors
On 11/25/2014 10:22 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 2014-11-25 18:59 GMT+01:00 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>:
>> It seems to me this is a problem of your architecture. That doesn't
>> make it a generic problem. Your architecture should detect that a
>> probe was disconnected and de-instantiate the device automatically
>> if so, and re-instantiate it if it is re-inserted. Ultimately this
>> should be done with, for example, devicetree overlays.
>
> You're right and it's planned to be done this way in the future, when
> this project exits its prototype phase (around Q2 2015). Nevertheless
> I still think that if we're adding a set function, it should behave
> like the getters and check the value returned by
> i2c_smbus_write_word_swapped().
>
I do not question that. I question changing the return value to -ENODEV.
Repeating my earlier question: Is the resistor value changed by software
or by changing the probe ?
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists