Message-ID: <20141125190523.GA7715@schnuecks.de>
Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2014 20:05:23 +0100
From:	Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@...il.com>
To:	Changman Lee <cm224.lee@...sung.com>
Cc:	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: call flush_dcache_page when the
 page was updated

Hi Changman,

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:46:46AM +0900, Changman Lee wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> Thanks for your explanation kindly.
> 
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:08:54AM +0100, Simon Baatz wrote:
> > Hi Changman, Jaegeuk,
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 05:47:29PM +0900, Changman Lee wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:45:33PM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:04:10PM +0900, Changman Lee wrote:
> > > > > Hi Jaegeuk,
> > > > > 
> > > > > We should call flush_dcache_page before kunmap because the purpose of the cache flush is to address aliasing problem related to virtual address.
> > > > 
> > > > Oh, I just followed zero_user_segments below.
> > > > 
> > > > static inline void zero_user_segments(struct page *page,
> > > > 	unsigned start1, unsigned end1,
> > > > 	unsigned start2, unsigned end2)
> > > > {
> > > > 	void *kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
> > > > 
> > > > 	BUG_ON(end1 > PAGE_SIZE || end2 > PAGE_SIZE);
> > > > 
> > > > 	if (end1 > start1)
> > > > 		memset(kaddr + start1, 0, end1 - start1);
> > > > 
> > > > 	if (end2 > start2)
> > > > 		memset(kaddr + start2, 0, end2 - start2);
> > > > 
> > > > 	kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
> > > > 	flush_dcache_page(page);
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > Is this a wrong reference? Or, a bug?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Well.. Data in cache only have to be flushed until before other users read the data.
> > > If so, it's not a bug.
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, it is not a bug, since flush_dcache_page() needs to be able to
> > deal with non-kmapped pages. However, this may create overhead in
> > some situations.
> > 
> 
> Previously, I was vague but I thought that it should be different
> according to vaddr exists or not. So I told jaegeuk that it should
> be better to change an order between flush_dache_page and kunmap.
> But actually, it doesn't matter the order between them except
> the situation you said.
> Could you explain the situation that makes overhead by flushing after kummap.
> I can't imagine it by just seeing flush_dcache_page code.
> 

I was a not very precise here. Yes, flush_dcache_page() on ARM does
the same in both situations since it has no idea whether it is called
before or after kunmap.  However, flush_kernel_dcache_page() can
assume that it is called before kunmap and thus, for example, does not
need to pin a highmem page by kmap_high_get() (apart from not having
to care about flushing user space mappings)

> > According to documentation (see Documentation/cachetlb.txt), this is
> > a use for flush_kernel_dcache_page(), since the page has been
> > modified by the kernel only.  In contrast to flush_dcache_page(),
> > this function must be called before kunmap().
> > 
> > flush_kernel_dcache_page() does not need to flush the user space
> > aliases.  Additionally, at least on ARM, it does not flush at all
> > when called within kmap_atomic()/kunmap_atomic(), when
> > kunmap_atomic() is going to flush the page anyway.  (I know that
> > almost no one uses flush_kernel_dcache_page() (probably because
> > almost no one knows when to use which of the two functions), but it
> > may save a few cache flushes on architectures which are affected by
> > aliasing)
> > 
> > 
> > > > Anyway I modified as below.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > >From 7cb7b27c8cd2efc8a31d79239bef5b41c6e79216 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> > > > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:50:21 -0800
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: call flush_dcache_page when the page was updated
> > > > 
> > > > Whenever f2fs updates mapped pages, it needs to call flush_dcache_page.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  fs/f2fs/dir.c    | 7 ++++++-
> > > >  fs/f2fs/inline.c | 2 ++
> > > >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/dir.c b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
> > > > index 5a49995..fabf4ee 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/dir.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
> > > > @@ -287,8 +287,10 @@ void f2fs_set_link(struct inode *dir, struct f2fs_dir_entry *de,
> > > >  	f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(page, type);
> > > >  	de->ino = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_ino);
> > > >  	set_de_type(de, inode);
> > > > -	if (!f2fs_has_inline_dentry(dir))
> > > > +	if (!f2fs_has_inline_dentry(dir)) {
> > > > +		flush_dcache_page(page);
> > > >  		kunmap(page);
> > > > +	}
> > 
> > Is this a page that may be mapped into user space? (I may be
> > completely wrong here, since I have no idea how this code works.  But
> > it looks like as if the answer is "no" ;-) ).
> > 
> > It is not necessary to flush pages that cannot be seen by user space
> > (see also the NOTE in the documentation of flush_dcache_page() in
> > cachetlb.txt). Thus, if you know that a page will not be mapped into
> > user space, please don't create the overhead of flushing it.
> > 
> 
> In the case of dentry unlike inline data, this is not mapped to user space, so dcache flush
> makes overhead. Do you mean that?

Yes. I suppose most architectures where D-cache aliasing is an issue
have optimizations that "defer" the actual flush when there are no
user space mappings.  But nevertheless, if you already now that there
can't be any aliases, there is no need to call these functions at
all.


- Simon 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists