[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141126090737.2860d33c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:07:37 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Luc Verhaegen <libv@...net.be>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the omap_dss2 tree
Hi Tomi,
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:11:59 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com> wrote:
>
> On 25/11/14 13:20, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> > On 11/25/2014 12:00 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >> On 18/11/14 17:07, David Herrmann wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Tomi Valkeinen
> >>> <tomi.valkeinen@...com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks Stephen!
> >>>>
> >>>> Hans, have you had a look at this? kbuild test bot also reported this.
> >>>
> >>> The fix from Stephen should not go to main-line. It breaks simplefb on
> >>> x86 without OF. Imo, linux/clk.h should provide a fallback if OF is
> >>> not defined (like it already does for of_clk_get() and friends).
> >>>
> >>> Hans, any comments?
> >>
> >> Hans, ping.
> >
> > Sorry I somehow missed this thread so far, I did see the kbuild mail, but
> > it looked like a false positive to me, for the compile error case I
> > already fixed
> > in the last revision of the patch, adding #ifdef CONFIG_OF around the
> > offending code.
> >
> > But on closer inspection I see that the entirety of linux/clk-provider.h
> > is wrapped
> > in one huge #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK and then later on also has:
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > ...
> > int of_clk_get_parent_count(struct device_node *np);
> > ...
> > #endif
> >
> > So we need both CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_COMMON_CLK, the attached patch
> > should fix this.
>
> Thanks, applied.
But not pushed out, yet? Just checking that you haven't pushed on
purpose.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists