[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1416897050.20575.18.camel@linux-t7sj.site>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:30:50 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
peterz@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, mgorman@...e.de,
liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@...ux.it,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, atomlin@...hat.com,
avagin@...nvz.org, gorcunov@...nvz.org, serge.hallyn@...onical.com,
athorlton@....com, oleg@...hat.com, vdavydov@...allels.com,
daeseok.youn@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org,
yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com, sbauer@....utah.edu,
vishnu.ps@...sung.com, axboe@...com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/fair: Add advisory flag for borrowing a
timeslice (was: Pre-emption control for userspace)
On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 21:03 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> I can see this "solution" help mostly with userspace spinlocks,
> which are relics of a past era that need to die. There is no
> way userspace spinlocks will not fail miserably on virtual
> machines, and it is time to get rid of them.
No, not really. Spinlocks are still very useful on bare metal.
Virtualization is not the only thing out there.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists