lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1416901802-24211-38-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:50:01 +0800
From:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>
Subject: [Patch Part3 v4 37/38] x86, irq: Introduce mechanism to support different vector allocation policies

Introduce mechanism to support different vector allocation policies,
so platform or user may choose the best suitable CPU vector allocation
policy. Currently two policies are supported:
1) allocate CPU vector from cpumask_of_node(dev_to_node(dev))
2) allocate from apic->target_cpus(), this is the default policy

Platform driver may call set_vector_alloc_policy() to choose the
preferred policies.

This mechanism may be used to support NumaConnect systems to allocate
CPU vectors from device local node.

We may also enhance to support per-cpu vector allocation if it's needed.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h |   12 ++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c |   66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
index e7ae6eb84934..61807eed48a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
@@ -170,6 +170,17 @@ enum {
 	X86_IRQ_ALLOC_CONTIGOUS_VECTORS		= 0x1,
 };
 
+enum {
+	/* Allocate vector from cpumask_of_node(dev_to_node(dev)) */
+	X86_VECTOR_POL_NODE = 0x1,
+	/* Allocate vector from apic->target_cpus() */
+	X86_VECTOR_POL_DEFAULT = 0x2,
+	/* Allocate vector from cpumask assigned by caller */
+	X86_VECTOR_POL_CALLER = 0x4,
+	X86_VECTOR_POL_MIN = X86_VECTOR_POL_NODE,
+	X86_VECTOR_POL_MAX = X86_VECTOR_POL_CALLER,
+};
+
 struct irq_cfg {
 	unsigned int		dest_apicid;
 	u8			vector;
@@ -185,6 +196,7 @@ extern struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned int irq);
 extern struct irq_cfg *irqd_cfg(struct irq_data *irq_data);
 extern void lock_vector_lock(void);
 extern void unlock_vector_lock(void);
+extern void set_vector_alloc_policy(unsigned int policy);
 extern void setup_vector_irq(int cpu);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 extern void send_cleanup_vector(struct irq_cfg *);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
index 0e7c39beefed..16de8906ee1e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ struct apic_chip_data {
 	u8			move_in_progress : 1;
 };
 
+static unsigned int x86_vector_alloc_policy = X86_VECTOR_POL_DEFAULT |
+					      X86_VECTOR_POL_CALLER;
 struct irq_domain *x86_vector_domain;
 static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(vector_lock);
 static struct irq_chip lapic_controller;
@@ -71,6 +73,12 @@ struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned int irq)
 	return irqd_cfg(irq_get_irq_data(irq));
 }
 
+void set_vector_alloc_policy(unsigned int policy)
+{
+	if (!WARN_ON((policy & (X86_VECTOR_POL_MAX - 1)) == 0))
+		x86_vector_alloc_policy = policy | X86_VECTOR_POL_CALLER;
+}
+
 static struct apic_chip_data *alloc_apic_chip_data(int node)
 {
 	struct apic_chip_data *data;
@@ -259,12 +267,6 @@ void copy_irq_alloc_info(struct irq_alloc_info *dst, struct irq_alloc_info *src)
 		memset(dst, 0, sizeof(*dst));
 }
 
-static inline const struct cpumask *
-irq_alloc_info_get_mask(struct irq_alloc_info *info)
-{
-	return (!info || !info->mask) ? apic->target_cpus() : info->mask;
-}
-
 static void x86_vector_free_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain,
 				 unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
 {
@@ -285,13 +287,59 @@ static void x86_vector_free_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain,
 	}
 }
 
+static int assign_irq_vector_policy(int irq, int node,
+				    struct apic_chip_data *data,
+				    struct irq_alloc_info *info)
+{
+	int err = -EBUSY;
+	unsigned int policy;
+	const struct cpumask *mask;
+
+	if (info && info->mask)
+		policy = X86_VECTOR_POL_CALLER;
+	else
+		policy = X86_VECTOR_POL_MIN;
+
+	for (; policy <= X86_VECTOR_POL_MAX; policy <<= 1) {
+		if (!(x86_vector_alloc_policy & policy))
+			continue;
+
+		switch (policy) {
+		case X86_VECTOR_POL_NODE:
+			if (node >= 0)
+				mask = cpumask_of_node(node);
+			else
+				mask = NULL;
+			break;
+		case X86_VECTOR_POL_DEFAULT:
+			mask = apic->target_cpus();
+			break;
+		case X86_VECTOR_POL_CALLER:
+			if (info && info->mask)
+				mask = info->mask;
+			else
+				mask = NULL;
+			break;
+		default:
+			mask = NULL;
+			break;
+		}
+		if (mask) {
+			err = assign_irq_vector(irq, data, mask);
+			if (!err)
+				return 0;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int x86_vector_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
 				 unsigned int nr_irqs, void *arg)
 {
 	int i, err;
 	struct apic_chip_data *data;
 	struct irq_data *irq_data;
-	const struct cpumask *mask;
 	struct irq_alloc_info *info = arg;
 
 	if (disable_apic)
@@ -301,7 +349,6 @@ static int x86_vector_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
 	if ((info->flags & X86_IRQ_ALLOC_CONTIGOUS_VECTORS) && nr_irqs > 1)
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
-	mask = irq_alloc_info_get_mask(info);
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
 		irq_data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq + i);
 		BUG_ON(!irq_data);
@@ -319,7 +366,8 @@ static int x86_vector_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
 		irq_data->chip = &lapic_controller;
 		irq_data->chip_data = data;
 		irq_data->hwirq = virq + i;
-		err = assign_irq_vector(virq, data, mask);
+		err = assign_irq_vector_policy(virq, irq_data->node, data,
+					       info);
 		if (err)
 			goto error;
 	}
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ