Message-ID: <CADGdYn4Vi2wV1y3Y0cTbPL0cFR2EEV7jT=82fHNYu+=xwZ7mBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:27:58 +0530
From:	amit daniel kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
To:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 08/12] soc: samsung: pm_domain: Add support for
 parent power domain

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 24 November 2014 at 14:04, Amit Daniel Kachhap
> <amit.daniel@...sung.com> wrote:
>> This patch adds supports for parent power domain. This will ensure
>> invoking of parent/child power domain on/off in a correct sequence.
>> In exynos7 SOC's, power domain controllers have parent and child
>> hierarchy.
>>
>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt           |    2 +
>>  drivers/soc/samsung/pm_domains.c                   |   43 +++++++++++++++++++-
>>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
>> index 00ebda1..0160bdc 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Optional Properties:
>>         - pclkN, clkN: Pairs of parent of input clock and input clock to the
>>                 devices in this power domain. Maximum of 4 pairs (N = 0 to 3)
>>                 are supported currently.
>> +- parents: phandle of parent power domains.
>>
>>  Node of a device using power domains must have a samsung,power-domain property
>>  defined with a phandle to respective power domain.
>> @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ Example:
>>         mfc_pd: power-domain@...44060 {
>>                 compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd", "samsung,exynos7-pd-mfc";
>>                 reg = <0x10044060 0x20>;
>> +               parents = <&pd_top>;
>>                 #power-domain-cells = <0>;
>>         };
>
> This seems like a good and generic approach to describe that a PM
> domain could have a parent. I would suggest to rename it, such it
> reflects its a PM domain binding though.
I am not sure if this is generic. I guess PD's represented like below
are more generic.
PD1 {
        PD2 {
                PD3 {
                };
        };
};

>
> So, maybe we can add this as a common DT binding for the generic PM
> domain instead of having it as Exynos specific?
Yes sure.

Regards,
Amit D
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists