[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1416912004-5928-99-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:37:28 +0000
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 098/254] sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock
3.16.7-ckt2 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
commit 66339c31bc3978d5fff9c4b4cb590a861def4db2 upstream.
dl_bw_of() dereferences rq->rd which has to have RCU read lock held.
Probability of use-after-free isn't zero here.
Also add lockdep assert into dl_bw_cpus().
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140922183624.11015.71558.stgit@localhost
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0acf96b790c5..169720f46c30 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1969,6 +1969,8 @@ unsigned long to_ratio(u64 period, u64 runtime)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
{
+ rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+ "sched RCU must be held");
return &cpu_rq(i)->rd->dl_bw;
}
@@ -1977,6 +1979,8 @@ static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd;
int cpus = 0;
+ rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+ "sched RCU must be held");
for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask)
cpus++;
@@ -7541,6 +7545,8 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
int cpu, ret = 0;
unsigned long flags;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
/*
* Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some
* value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in
@@ -7562,6 +7568,8 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
break;
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
return ret;
}
@@ -7577,6 +7585,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
if (global_rt_runtime() != RUNTIME_INF)
new_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime());
+ rcu_read_lock();
/*
* FIXME: As above...
*/
@@ -7587,6 +7596,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
dl_b->bw = new_bw;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
static int sched_rt_global_validate(void)
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists