[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1411251022141.976-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:24:25 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
cc: johan@...nel.org, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: usbhid: get/put around clearing needs_remote_wakeup
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Benson Leung wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > There is no USB wrapper for pm_runtime_idle calls, but one could be
> > added. Still, in the meantime can you check to see what happens if you
> > add
> >
> > pm_runtime_idle(&usbhid->intf->dev);
> >
> > in usbhid_close() just after needs_remote_wakeup is set to 0? You can
> > do the same thing in usbhid_stop() if you want.
>
> I tried using this in lieu of usb_autopm_get/put_interface:
>
> usbhid->intf->needs_remote_wakeup = 0;
> pm_runtime_idle(&usbhid->intf->dev);
> pm_runtime_idle(usbhid->intf->dev.parent);
>
> It did not work. I see the autosuspend_check() that was kicked off as
> a result of hid_hw_power, which falls into the "remote wakeup needed
> for autosuspend" branch, but I don't see another autosuspend_check()
> that picks up the updated value of needs_remote_wakeup.
Well, why not?
In order to work on the kernel effectively, you need the right
mind-set. Don't just tell people when something goes wrong -- figure
out why the problem occurred and propose a way to fix it.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists