[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141125165105.GP4241@x1>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:51:05 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: "Tan, Raymond" <raymond.tan@...el.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Chen, Alvin" <alvin.chen@...el.com>,
"Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Add Intel Quark X1000
I2C-GPIO MFD Driver
Mike,
Something for you down below.
> > > In Quark X1000, there's a single PCI device that provides both an I2C
> > > controller and a GPIO controller. This MFD driver will split the 2
> > > devices for their respective drivers.
> > >
> > > This patch is based on Josef Ahmad's initial work for Quark enabling.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Weike Chen <alvin.chen@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Raymond Tan <raymond.tan@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 11 ++
> > > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c | 298
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 310 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
[...]
> > > + depends on COMMON_CLK
> >
> > I don't think you should depend on this. Just use the API and fail if it doesn't
> > find the clock you're after.
>
> This was added to make sure the clk initialization and other clk related calls will work with the MFD.
[...]
> > > +struct clk *intel_quark_i2c_clk;
> > > +struct clk_lookup *intel_quark_i2c_clk_lookups;
> >
> > Why do these need to be global?
>
> I was trying to keep these as runtime allocated variables, and cleaned up with removal of the driver / upon error handling.
They still can be. But they need to be in a struct somewhere and not
global.
[...]
> > > +static int intel_quark_register_i2c_clk(struct pci_dev *pdev) {
> > > + intel_quark_i2c_clk_lookups = devm_kcalloc(
> > > +
> > > + &pdev->dev, INTEL_QUARK_I2C_NCLK,
> > > + sizeof(*intel_quark_i2c_clk_lookups), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +
> > > + if (!intel_quark_i2c_clk_lookups)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + intel_quark_i2c_clk_lookups[0].dev_id =
> > > +INTEL_QUARK_I2C_CONTROLLER_CLK;
> > > +
> > > + intel_quark_i2c_clk = clk_register_fixed_rate(
> > > + &pdev->dev, INTEL_QUARK_I2C_CONTROLLER_CLK, NULL,
> > > + CLK_IS_ROOT, INTEL_QUARK_I2C_CLK_HZ);
> > > +
> > > + return clk_register_clkdevs(intel_quark_i2c_clk,
> > > + intel_quark_i2c_clk_lookups, INTEL_QUARK_I2C_NCLK);
> >
> > We don't normally register clks from MFD. Normally they are registered in
> > drivers/clk and fetched when a device requires them.
> > Why is this different?
>
> This is a static clk and on this platform, there's no clk hardware
> to have the clk driver to initialize this and add into the global
> struct for use
> later by i2c controller. The hardware on the platform itself is
> same, and the current driver (i2c_designware_platform) requires the
> clk
> for its operation. Due to this, I decided to have the clk initialize
> in the MFD before the device being added, which later will trigger
> the probe on the i2c controller driver.
Mike,
Can I get your input on this please?
[...]
> > > + pdata = intel_quark_get_i2c_mode(pdev);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(pdata))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(pdata);
> >
> > Bring this functionality into here?
>
> Were you referring the contents of intel_quark_get_i2c_mode(), and avoid the additional function call instead?
Right. Please rid intel_quark_get_i2c_mode().
[...]
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists