[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141125173925.GE3331@console-pimps.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:39:25 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: leif.lindholm@...aro.org, roy.franz@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, mark.rutland@....com,
msalter@...hat.com, dyoung@...hat.com, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
matt.fleming@...el.com, will.deacon@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, grant.likely@...aro.org,
geoff.levand@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] arm64: improve CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM handling
On Tue, 18 Nov, at 01:57:02PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Improve the handling of /dev/mem mappings under CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM by:
> - allowing read-only access to parts of System RAM that are not
> considered memory by the kernel, this is mainly intended for exposing
> UEFI Configuration tables to userland;
> - avoid using non-cached mappings for those parts of System RAM, as it
> may result in mismatched attributes.
Is this really the best way to expose EFI config tables?
We already have parts in /sys/firmware/efi/ and in particular we expose
the runtime mappings there for kexec on x86.
Hooking this into the /dev/mem infrastructure just seems wrong to me.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists