[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJWJzRaZeCuZJWZq0ukVLiSU2crUbWchP-PJtV85CvZM3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:13:50 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Patrick Titiano <ptitiano@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] hwmon: ina2xx: bail-out from ina2xx_probe() in case
of configuration errors
2014-11-26 4:05 GMT+01:00 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>:
> On 11/25/2014 10:30 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Repeating my earlier question: Is the resistor value changed by software
>> or by changing the probe ?
>>
>
> Looking into the available documents, I am quite sure that the resistor
> is changed by replacing the probe, in other words by pulling the board
> with the ina226 and replacing it with another one. Given that, configuring
> the shunt resistor value with a sysfs attribute is really the wrong way
> to do it; you should use probe specific devicetree overlays instead.
Yes, it's changed by replacing the probes.
As for the averaging rate: it's a programmable feature of the chip and
it's useful for our user interface for noise reduction (or the
opposite - to be able to see the actual distortion), can this be
accepted after applying the fixes according to your review?
Bart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists