[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141126105517.GA29982@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:55:18 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Hendershot <rshendershot@...si.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.17 100/141] x86, microcode: Fix accessing dis_ucode_ldr
on 32-bit
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:00:45AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Sigh... I take this back. It breaks 32-bit baremetal. I haven't looked any
> further but it seems to be dying very early. I suspect cpuid pv_op is not
> set up yet. If that's true, perhaps you could check whether it is valid in
> x86_guest()?
Right, this is why we're using the native variants in the early loader.
So we need a different method for detecting very early whether we're
running as a guest.
What I'd like more, though, is if we continue debugging the original
issue where we fail in load_ucode_intel_ap(). Does it happen on this line:
initrd_start_addr = (unsigned long)__pa_nodebug(*initrd_start_p);
where we deref the initrd_start_p? Do you have a full splat with a Code:
section?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists