[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5475CD41.8090903@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:53:21 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
CC: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to
specify uninitialized timer registers
On 11/26/2014 01:55 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:49:57 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>> On 11/26/2014 01:48 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>> Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:30:58 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>>>> On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:51:08 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>>>>>> Hi Doug, Olof,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed from some other patches in
>>>>>> arm-soc. Olof was proposing to take this patch through its tree to
>>>>>> facilitate the integration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Olof, is it this patch you were worried about ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this is one of two patches in question.
>>>>>
>>>>> "clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers when
>>>>> requested"
>>>>> [0] would be the second one.
>>>>>
>>>>> And the patch for arm-soc that Olof means would be "ARM: dts: rk3288:
>>>>> add
>>>>> arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured" [1].
>>>>
>>>> Ok, so IIUC, "clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers
>>>> when requested" should go via arm's tree, right ?
>>>
>>> If I'm reading Olof's irc-comments from yesterday correctly, that is right
>>> and the 3 patches should go in together:
>>>
>>> - "clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers
>>>
>>> when requested" fixes the use of physical timers in general
>>>
>>> - "clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to specify uninitialized
>>>
>>> timer registers" allows this to be set from dt
>>>
>>> - "ARM: dts: rk3288: add arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured" enables this
>>> on>
>>> rk3288
>>
>> Ok, then I drop them from my tree and will let Olof to handle them.
>
> But maybe you could give them an Ack :-)
Already done :)
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists