[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2744845.J3XUj2a9bM@dabox>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:46:52 +0100
From: Tim Sander <tim@...eglstein.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
patches@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>,
Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
Dmitry Pervushin <dpervushin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18-rc3 v9 5/5] arm: smp: Handle ipi_cpu_backtrace() using FIQ (if available)
Hi Daniel
Am Dienstag, 25. November 2014, 17:26:41 schrieb Daniel Thompson:
> Previous changes have introduced both a replacement default FIQ handler
> and an implementation of arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace for ARM but
> these are currently independent of each other.
>
> This patch plumbs together these features making it possible, on platforms
> that support it, to trigger backtrace using FIQ.
Does this ipi handler interfere in any way with set_fiq_handler?
As far as i know there is only one FIQ handler vector so i guess there is a
potential conflict. But i have not worked with IPI's so i might be completley
wrong.
Regards
Tim
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h | 3 +++
> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 4 +++-
> arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> index 18f5a554134f..b076584ac0fa 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
> # error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
> #endif
>
> +#define SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK 0x0100
> +
> #define raw_smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)
>
> struct seq_file;
> @@ -79,6 +81,7 @@ extern void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu);
> extern void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask);
> extern void arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask);
>
> +extern void ipi_cpu_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs);
> extern int register_ipi_completion(struct completion *completion, int cpu);
>
> struct smp_operations {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> index 14c594a12bef..e923843562d9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ static void ipi_cpu_stop(unsigned int cpu)
> cpu_relax();
> }
>
> -static void ipi_cpu_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +void ipi_cpu_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> @@ -580,6 +580,8 @@ void handle_IPI(int ipinr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
>
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK != BIT(IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE));
> +
> if ((unsigned)ipinr < NR_IPI) {
> trace_ipi_entry(ipi_types[ipinr]);
> __inc_irq_stat(cpu, ipi_irqs[ipinr]);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
> index 4dc45b38e56e..9eb05be9526e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -483,6 +483,9 @@ asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry
> handle_fiq_as_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs) #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_GIC
> gic_handle_fiq_ipi();
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + ipi_cpu_backtrace(regs);
> +#endif
>
> nmi_exit();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists