[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141126135508.GA6911@sepie.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:55:08 +0100
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@...panasonic.com>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: collect shorthands into scripts/Kbuild.include
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:31:13PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> The shorthand "clean" is defined in both the top Makefile and
> scripts/Makefile.clean. Likewise, the "hdr-inst" is defined in
> both the top Makefile and scripts/Makefile.headersinst.
>
> To reduce code duplication, this commit collects them into
> scripts/Kbuild.include like the "build" and "modbuiltin" shorthands.
> It requires scripts/Makefile.clean to include scripts/Kbuild.include,
> but its impact on the performance of "make clean" should be
> negligible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@...panasonic.com>
> ---
>
> Marek, please decide if this patch should be applied or not.
>
> I am not so sure if 10% of performance regression is acceptable.
> I do not mind at all if this patch is rejected.
>
> Before this commit, on my box,
>
> $ time make clean
>
> real 0m2.916s
> user 0m1.040s
> sys 0m2.005s
>
> After,
>
> real 0m3.221s
> user 0m1.109s
> sys 0m2.271s
0.3s is even less than my guess. And as I said, you can run make clean
in parallel, so I'm not thrilled. Applied to kbuild.git#kbuild.
Thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists