lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:34:19 +0530
From:	Abhilash Kesavan <kesavan.abhilash@...il.com>
To:	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Cc:	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Amit Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>,
	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
	최찬우 <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] thermal: exynos: add special clock support

Hi Eduardo,

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Abhilash,
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:21:10AM +0530, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
>> Exynos7 has a special clock required for the functional operation
>> of the TMU that is not present in earlier SoCs. Add support for
>> this clock and update the binding documentation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@...sung.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>>       - Added a per-soc flag to indicate the presence of special clock
>>       - Changed the name of special clock from "tmu_sclk" to "sclk"
>>       - Fixed the error handling for sclk
>>
>> Tested on 5420 and 5800 based chromebooks, no change in existing behavior.
>>
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt |    3 ++
>>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c               |   31 ++++++++++++++++----
>>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> index ae738f5..acf4705 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> @@ -32,10 +32,13 @@
>>  - clocks : The main clocks for TMU device
>>       -- 1. operational clock for TMU channel
>>       -- 2. optional clock to access the shared registers of TMU channel
>> +     -- 3. optional special clock for functional operation
>>  - clock-names : Thermal system clock name
>>       -- "tmu_apbif" operational clock for current TMU channel
>>       -- "tmu_triminfo_apbif" clock to access the shared triminfo register
>>               for current TMU channel
>> +     -- "sclk" clock for functional operation of the current TMU
>> +             channel
>>  - vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
>>               voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
>>               board/platform specific dts file.
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> index d44d91d..8ed8409 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> @@ -123,11 +123,14 @@
>>   * @base: base address of the single instance of the TMU controller.
>>   * @base_second: base address of the common registers of the TMU controller.
>>   * @irq: irq number of the TMU controller.
>> + * @needs_sclk: SoC specific flag indicating that sclk is required for
>> +     functional operation of the TMU controller.
>>   * @soc: id of the SOC type.
>>   * @irq_work: pointer to the irq work structure.
>>   * @lock: lock to implement synchronization.
>>   * @clk: pointer to the clock structure.
>>   * @clk_sec: pointer to the clock structure for accessing the base_second.
>> + * @sclk: pointer to the clock structure for accessing the tmu special clock.
>>   * @temp_error1: fused value of the first point trim.
>>   * @temp_error2: fused value of the second point trim.
>>   * @regulator: pointer to the TMU regulator structure.
>> @@ -144,10 +147,11 @@ struct exynos_tmu_data {
>>       void __iomem *base;
>>       void __iomem *base_second;
>>       int irq;
>> +     bool needs_sclk;
>>       enum soc_type soc;
>>       struct work_struct irq_work;
>>       struct mutex lock;
>> -     struct clk *clk, *clk_sec;
>> +     struct clk *clk, *clk_sec, *sclk;
>>       u8 temp_error1, temp_error2;
>>       struct regulator *regulator;
>>       struct thermal_sensor_conf *reg_conf;
>> @@ -883,10 +887,24 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>               goto err_clk_sec;
>>       }
>>
>> +     if (data->needs_sclk) {
>
> Based on the trend we see from Bartlomiej's and Lukasz' works, you
> should be asking for SoC version, not adding a flag. Can you please
> crosscheck with them?

I planned to populate this flag as true for Exynos7 in
exynos_map_dt_data() where other soc specific methods are being setup.

Bartlomiej/Lukasz can you kindly comment on if you would prefer the
check to be based on the SoC version.

Regards,
Abhilash
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eduardo Valentin
>
>> +             data->sclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "sclk");
>> +             if (IS_ERR(data->sclk)) {
>> +                     dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sclk\n");
>> +                     goto err_clk;
>> +             } else {
>> +                     ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->sclk);
>> +                     if (ret) {
>> +                             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable sclk\n");
>> +                             goto err_clk;
>> +                     }
>> +             }
>> +     }
>> +
>>       ret = exynos_tmu_initialize(pdev);
>>       if (ret) {
>>               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to initialize TMU\n");
>> -             goto err_clk;
>> +             goto err_sclk;
>>       }
>>
>>       exynos_tmu_control(pdev, true);
>> @@ -896,7 +914,7 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>                               sizeof(struct thermal_sensor_conf), GFP_KERNEL);
>>       if (!sensor_conf) {
>>               ret = -ENOMEM;
>> -             goto err_clk;
>> +             goto err_sclk;
>>       }
>>       sprintf(sensor_conf->name, "therm_zone%d", data->id);
>>       sensor_conf->read_temperature = (int (*)(void *))exynos_tmu_read;
>> @@ -928,7 +946,7 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>       ret = exynos_register_thermal(sensor_conf);
>>       if (ret) {
>>               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register thermal interface\n");
>> -             goto err_clk;
>> +             goto err_sclk;
>>       }
>>       data->reg_conf = sensor_conf;
>>
>> @@ -936,10 +954,12 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>               IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&pdev->dev), data);
>>       if (ret) {
>>               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request irq: %d\n", data->irq);
>> -             goto err_clk;
>> +             goto err_sclk;
>>       }
>>
>>       return 0;
>> +err_sclk:
>> +     clk_disable_unprepare(data->sclk);
>>  err_clk:
>>       clk_unprepare(data->clk);
>>  err_clk_sec:
>> @@ -956,6 +976,7 @@ static int exynos_tmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>>       exynos_tmu_control(pdev, false);
>>
>> +     clk_disable_unprepare(data->sclk);
>>       clk_unprepare(data->clk);
>>       if (!IS_ERR(data->clk_sec))
>>               clk_unprepare(data->clk_sec);
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ