[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141126155508.GC29079@treble.hsd1.ky.comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:55:08 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, kpatch@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] Kernel Live Patching
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:00:54PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/11/26 2:15), Seth Jennings wrote:
> > Note to Steve:
> > Masami's IPMODIFY patch is heading for -next via your tree. Once it arrives,
> > I'll rebase and make the change to set IPMODIFY. Do not pull this for -next
> > yet. This version (v4) is for review and gathering acks.
>
> BTW, as we discussed IPMODIFY is an exclusive flag. So if we allocate ftrace_ops
> for each function in each patch, it could be conflict each other.
> Maybe we need to have another ops hashtable to find such conflict and new
> handler to handle it.
I agree, but this is not a problem with the current patch set because it
doesn't yet support patching the same function multiple times :-)
--
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists