| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1417021067-4853-1-git-send-email-bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:57:36 -0500
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH] set_mb: Use smp_store_release() instead of set_mb()
set_mb() and smp_store_release() perform the same function. Also there are only
a few users of set_mb(). We can convert these users to use smp_store_release()
and delete the set_mb() definition.
The following patch changes the users and if this is OK I will go ahead and
delete the set_mb() definition. Comments and suggestions welcome.
Thanks!
Pranith
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
---
fs/select.c | 6 +++---
include/linux/sched.h | 14 +++++++-------
kernel/futex.c | 4 ++--
kernel/sched/wait.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c
index 467bb1c..959a908 100644
--- a/fs/select.c
+++ b/fs/select.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static int __pollwake(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
* doesn't imply write barrier and the users expect write
* barrier semantics on wakeup functions. The following
* smp_wmb() is equivalent to smp_wmb() in try_to_wake_up()
- * and is paired with set_mb() in poll_schedule_timeout.
+ * and is paired with smp_store_release() in poll_schedule_timeout.
*/
smp_wmb();
pwq->triggered = 1;
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ int poll_schedule_timeout(struct poll_wqueues *pwq, int state,
/*
* Prepare for the next iteration.
*
- * The following set_mb() serves two purposes. First, it's
+ * The following smp_store_release() serves two purposes. First, it's
* the counterpart rmb of the wmb in pollwake() such that data
* written before wake up is always visible after wake up.
* Second, the full barrier guarantees that triggered clearing
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ int poll_schedule_timeout(struct poll_wqueues *pwq, int state,
* this problem doesn't exist for the first iteration as
* add_wait_queue() has full barrier semantics.
*/
- set_mb(pwq->triggered, 0);
+ smp_store_release(pwq->triggered, 0);
return rc;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 8db31ef..4621d0b 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!(
#define set_task_state(tsk, state_value) \
do { \
(tsk)->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_; \
- set_mb((tsk)->state, (state_value)); \
+ smp_store_release((tsk)->state, (state_value)); \
} while (0)
/*
@@ -272,10 +272,10 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!(
current->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_; \
current->state = (state_value); \
} while (0)
-#define set_current_state(state_value) \
- do { \
- current->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_; \
- set_mb(current->state, (state_value)); \
+#define set_current_state(state_value) \
+ do { \
+ current->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_; \
+ smp_store_release(current->state, (state_value)); \
} while (0)
#else
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!(
#define __set_task_state(tsk, state_value) \
do { (tsk)->state = (state_value); } while (0)
#define set_task_state(tsk, state_value) \
- set_mb((tsk)->state, (state_value))
+ smp_store_release((tsk)->state, (state_value))
/*
* set_current_state() includes a barrier so that the write of current->state
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!(
#define __set_current_state(state_value) \
do { current->state = (state_value); } while (0)
#define set_current_state(state_value) \
- set_mb(current->state, (state_value))
+ smp_store_release(current->state, (state_value))
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 63678b5..0604355 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -2055,8 +2055,8 @@ static void futex_wait_queue_me(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, struct futex_q *q,
{
/*
* The task state is guaranteed to be set before another task can
- * wake it. set_current_state() is implemented using set_mb() and
- * queue_me() calls spin_unlock() upon completion, both serializing
+ * wake it. set_current_state() is implemented using smp_store_release()
+ * and queue_me() calls spin_unlock() upon completion, both serializing
* access to the hash list and forcing another memory barrier.
*/
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/wait.c b/kernel/sched/wait.c
index 852143a..7d990c0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/wait.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ long wait_woken(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, long timeout)
* condition being true _OR_ WQ_FLAG_WOKEN such that we will not miss
* an event.
*/
- set_mb(wait->flags, wait->flags & ~WQ_FLAG_WOKEN); /* B */
+ smp_store_release(wait->flags, wait->flags & ~WQ_FLAG_WOKEN); /* B */
return timeout;
}
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ int woken_wake_function(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
* doesn't imply write barrier and the users expects write
* barrier semantics on wakeup functions. The following
* smp_wmb() is equivalent to smp_wmb() in try_to_wake_up()
- * and is paired with set_mb() in wait_woken().
+ * and is paired with smp_store_release() in wait_woken().
*/
smp_wmb(); /* C */
wait->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists