linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] i2c: davinci: use ICPFUNC to toggle I2C as gpio for bus recovery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5476085B.40009@ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:05:31 +0200
From:	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
CC:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
	<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Looijmans <milo-software@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] i2c: davinci: use ICPFUNC to toggle I2C as gpio
 for bus recovery

On 11/26/2014 06:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear
>> that the bus recovery in the i2c-davinci driver will only work on
>> some boards, because on regular boards, this will only toggle GPIO
>> lines that aren't muxed to the actual pins.
>>
>> The I2C controller on SoCs like da850 (and da830), Keystone 2 has the
>> built-in capability to bit-bang its lines by using the ICPFUNC registers
>> of the i2c controller.
>> Implement the suggested procedure by toggling SCL and checking SDA using
>> the ICPFUNC registers of the I2C controller when present. Allow platforms
>> to indicate the presence of the ICPFUNC registers with a has_pfunc platform
>> data flag and add optional DT property "ti,has-pfunc" to indicate
>> the same in DT.
> On what does it depend if this pfunc stuff works or not? Only the SoC,
> or also on some board specific properties?

SoC / set of SoCs. Also, similar feature is supported by OMAP and AM335x/AM437x SoCs
using I2C_SYSTEST register.

> Given the former using the
> compatible string to detect its availability would be better. (In this
> case also sorry, didn't consider this case when requesting the property
> in the last round.)
> 
> The patch looks ok.

regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/