Message-ID: <20141126173444.GG3245@hawk.usersys.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Nov 2014 18:34:45 +0100
From:	Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
To:	Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
Cc:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, christoffer.dall@...aro.org,
	marc.zyngier@....com, peter.maydell@...aro.org, agraf@...e.de,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, jan.kiszka@...mens.com,
	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:ABI/API" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	r65777@...escale.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, bp@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] KVM: arm64: guest debug, HW assisted debug support

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:10:05PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> This adds support for userspace to control the HW debug registers for
> guest debug. We'll only copy the $ARCH defined number across as that's
> all that hyp.S will use anyway. I've moved some helper functions into
> the hw_breakpoint.h header for re-use.
> 
> As with single step we need to tweak the guest registers to enable the
> exceptions but we don't want to overwrite the guest copy of these
> registers so this is done close to the guest entry.
> 
> Two new capabilities have been added to the KVM_EXTENSION ioctl to allow
> userspace to query the number of hardware break and watch points
> available on the host hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> index 9383359..5e8c673 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> @@ -2593,7 +2593,7 @@ The top 16 bits of the control field are architecture specific control
>  flags which can include the following:
>  
>    - KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP:     using software breakpoints [x86, arm64]
> -  - KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP:     using hardware breakpoints [x86, s390]
> +  - KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP:     using hardware breakpoints [x86, s390, arm64]
>    - KVM_GUESTDBG_INJECT_DB:     inject DB type exception [x86]
>    - KVM_GUESTDBG_INJECT_BP:     inject BP type exception [x86]
>    - KVM_GUESTDBG_EXIT_PENDING:  trigger an immediate guest exit [s390]
> @@ -2606,7 +2606,10 @@ we need to ensure the guest vCPUs architecture specific registers are
>  updated to the correct (supplied) values.
>  
>  The second part of the structure is architecture specific and
> -typically contains a set of debug registers.
> +typically contains a set of debug registers. For arm64 the number of
> +debug registers is implementation defined and can be determined by
> +querying the KVM_CAP_GUEST_DEBUG_HW_BPS and KVM_CAP_GUEST_DEBUG_HW_WPS
> +capabilities.
>  
>  When debug events exit the main run loop with the reason
>  KVM_EXIT_DEBUG with the kvm_debug_exit_arch part of the kvm_run
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index a76daae..c8ec23a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>  #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>  #include <asm/virt.h>
>  #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
> +#include <asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> @@ -341,8 +342,37 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  	/* Hardware assisted Break and Watch points */
>  	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP) {
> -		kvm_info("HW BP support requested, not yet implemented\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		int i;
> +		int nb = get_num_brps();
> +		int nw = get_num_wrps();
> +
> +		/* Copy across up to IMPDEF debug registers to our
> +		 * shadow copy in the vcpu structure. The hyp.S code
> +		 * will then set them up before we re-enter the guest.
> +		 */
> +		memcpy(vcpu->arch.guest_debug_regs.dbg_bcr,
> +			dbg->arch.dbg_bcr, sizeof(__u64)*nb);
> +		memcpy(vcpu->arch.guest_debug_regs.dbg_bvr,
> +			dbg->arch.dbg_bvr, sizeof(__u64)*nb);
> +		memcpy(vcpu->arch.guest_debug_regs.dbg_wcr,
> +			dbg->arch.dbg_wcr, sizeof(__u64)*nw);
> +		memcpy(vcpu->arch.guest_debug_regs.dbg_wvr,
> +			dbg->arch.dbg_wvr, sizeof(__u64)*nw);
> +
> +		kvm_info("HW BP support requested\n");
> +		for (i = 0; i < nb; i++) {
> +			kvm_info("%d: dbg_bcr=0x%llx dbg_bvr=0x%llx\n",
> +				 i,
> +				vcpu->arch.guest_debug_regs.dbg_bcr[i],
> +				vcpu->arch.guest_debug_regs.dbg_bvr[i]);
> +		}
> +		for (i = 0; i < nw; i++) {
> +			kvm_info("%d: dbg_wcr=0x%llx dbg_wvr=0x%llx\n",
> +				 i,
> +				 vcpu->arch.guest_debug_regs.dbg_wcr[i],
> +				 vcpu->arch.guest_debug_regs.dbg_wvr[i]);
> +		}

I think we decided to drop the kvm_info's. Here's several more lines of
logging to drop too.

> +		route_el2 = true;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* If we are going to handle any debug exceptions we need to
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> index 52b484b..c450552 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> @@ -130,6 +130,18 @@ static inline void ptrace_hw_copy_thread(struct task_struct *task)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +/* Determine number of BRP registers available. */
> +static inline int get_num_brps(void)
> +{
> +	return ((read_cpuid(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) >> 12) & 0xf) + 1;
> +}
> +
> +/* Determine number of WRP registers available. */
> +static inline int get_num_wrps(void)
> +{
> +	return ((read_cpuid(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) >> 20) & 0xf) + 1;
> +}
> +
>  extern struct pmu perf_ops_bp;
>  
>  #endif	/* __KERNEL__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 38b0f07..e386bf4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -103,8 +103,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>  	/* Exception Information */
>  	struct kvm_vcpu_fault_info fault;
>  
> -	/* Debug state */
> +	/* Guest debug state */
>  	u64 debug_flags;
> +	struct kvm_guest_debug_arch guest_debug_regs;
>  
>  	/* Pointer to host CPU context */
>  	kvm_cpu_context_t *host_cpu_context;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> index 78e5ae1..c9ecfd3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ int main(void)
>    DEFINE(VCPU_HPFAR_EL2,	offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.fault.hpfar_el2));
>    DEFINE(VCPU_DEBUG_FLAGS,	offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.debug_flags));
>    DEFINE(GUEST_DEBUG,		offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, guest_debug));
> +  DEFINE(GUEST_DEBUG_BCR,	offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.guest_debug_regs.dbg_bcr));
> +  DEFINE(GUEST_DEBUG_BVR,	offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.guest_debug_regs.dbg_bvr));
> +  DEFINE(GUEST_DEBUG_WCR,	offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.guest_debug_regs.dbg_wcr));
> +  DEFINE(GUEST_DEBUG_WVR,	offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.guest_debug_regs.dbg_wvr));
>    DEFINE(VCPU_HCR_EL2,		offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.hcr_el2));
>    DEFINE(VCPU_MDCR_EL2,	offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.mdcr_el2));
>    DEFINE(VCPU_IRQ_LINES,	offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.irq_lines));
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index df1cf15..45dcc6f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -49,18 +49,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, stepping_kernel_bp);
>  static int core_num_brps;
>  static int core_num_wrps;
>  
> -/* Determine number of BRP registers available. */
> -static int get_num_brps(void)
> -{
> -	return ((read_cpuid(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) >> 12) & 0xf) + 1;
> -}
> -
> -/* Determine number of WRP registers available. */
> -static int get_num_wrps(void)
> -{
> -	return ((read_cpuid(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) >> 20) & 0xf) + 1;
> -}
> -
>  int hw_breakpoint_slots(int type)
>  {
>  	/*
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index 6def054..d024e47 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,42 @@ static int kvm_handle_ss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * kvm_handle_hw_bp - handle HW assisted break point
> + *
> + * @vcpu:	the vcpu pointer

@run

> + *
> + */
> +static int kvm_handle_hw_bp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> +{
> +	WARN_ON(!(vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP));

Another WARN_ON to consider dropping.

> +
> +	run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> +	run->debug.arch.exit_type = KVM_DEBUG_EXIT_HW_BKPT;
> +	run->debug.arch.address = *vcpu_pc(vcpu);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_handle_watch - handle HW assisted watch point
> + *
> + * @vcpu:	the vcpu pointer

@run

> + *
> + * These are basically the same as breakpoints (and indeed may use the
> + * breakpoint in a linked fashion). However they generate a specific
> + * exception so we trap it here for reporting to the guest.
> + *
> + */
> +static int kvm_handle_watch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> +{
> +	WARN_ON(!(vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP));
> +

drop WARN_ON?

> +	run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> +	run->debug.arch.exit_type = KVM_DEBUG_EXIT_HW_WTPT;
> +	run->debug.arch.address = *vcpu_pc(vcpu);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = {
>  	[ESR_EL2_EC_WFI]	= kvm_handle_wfx,
>  	[ESR_EL2_EC_CP15_32]	= kvm_handle_cp15_32,
> @@ -125,6 +161,8 @@ static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = {
>  	[ESR_EL2_EC_IABT]	= kvm_handle_guest_abort,
>  	[ESR_EL2_EC_DABT]	= kvm_handle_guest_abort,
>  	[ESR_EL2_EC_SOFTSTP]    = kvm_handle_ss,
> +	[ESR_EL2_EC_WATCHPT]	= kvm_handle_watch,
> +	[ESR_EL2_EC_BREAKPT]	= kvm_handle_hw_bp,
>  	[ESR_EL2_EC_BKPT32]	= kvm_handle_bkpt,
>  	[ESR_EL2_EC_BRK64]	= kvm_handle_bkpt,
>  };
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S
> index b38ce3d..96f71ab 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
>  #include <linux/kvm.h>
>  
> +#include <uapi/asm/kvm.h>
>  #include <asm/assembler.h>
>  #include <asm/memory.h>
>  #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> @@ -174,6 +175,7 @@
>  	ldr	x3, [x0, #GUEST_DEBUG]
>  	tbz	x3, #KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE_SHIFT, 2f	// No guest debug
>  
> +	// Both Step and HW BP/WP ops need to modify spsr_el2 and mdscr_el1

Comment not quite right, since they both don't need to modify both.
Step modifies both. BP/WP modifies mdscr.

>  	// x0 - preserved as VCPU ptr
>  	// x1 - spsr
>  	// x2 - mdscr
> @@ -191,6 +193,11 @@
>  	eor	x1, x1, #DBG_SPSR_SS
>  	eor	x2, x2, #DBG_MDSCR_SS
>  1:
> +	// If we are doing HW BP/WP - set MDSCR_EL1.KDE/MDE
> +	tbz	x3, #KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP_SHIFT, 3f
> +	orr	x2, x2, #DBG_MDSCR_KDE
> +	orr	x2, x2, #DBG_MDSCR_MDE

We don't need to make sure KDE/MDE are cleared when we're not doing
BP/WP, as we do with the SS bit?

> +3:
>  	msr	spsr_el2, x1
>  	msr	mdscr_el1, x2
>  2:

Not super pleasant to have the labels occur in 1,3,2 order, but
whatever.

> @@ -815,6 +822,33 @@ __restore_debug:
>  
>  	ret
>  
> +/* Setup debug state for debug of guest */
> +__setup_debug:
> +	// x0: vcpu base address
> +	// x3: ptr to guest registers passed to setup_debug_registers
> +	// x5..x20/x26: trashed

Same comment on this header as for __restore_debug's new header in
a previous patch.

> +
> +	mrs	x26, id_aa64dfr0_el1
> +	ubfx	x24, x26, #12, #4	// Extract BRPs
> +	ubfx	x25, x26, #20, #4	// Extract WRPs
> +	mov	w26, #15
> +	sub	w24, w26, w24		// How many BPs to skip
> +	sub	w25, w26, w25		// How many WPs to skip
> +
> +	mov     x4, x24
> +	add	x3, x0, #GUEST_DEBUG_BCR
> +	setup_debug_registers dbgbcr

Now I see why the name change of restore_debug to setup_debug_registers,
it fits better here in __setup_debug. Should we name is something that
fits both better?

> +	add	x3, x0, #GUEST_DEBUG_BVR
> +	setup_debug_registers dbgbvr
> +
> +	mov     x4, x25
> +	add	x3, x0, #GUEST_DEBUG_WCR
> +	setup_debug_registers dbgwcr
> +	add	x3, x0, #GUEST_DEBUG_WVR
> +	setup_debug_registers dbgwvr
> +
> +	ret
> +
>  __save_fpsimd:
>  	save_fpsimd
>  	ret
> @@ -861,6 +895,13 @@ ENTRY(__kvm_vcpu_run)
>  	bl __restore_sysregs
>  	bl __restore_fpsimd
>  
> +        // Now is the time to set-up the debug registers if we
> +        // are debugging the guest
    ^^^ whitespace

> +	ldr	x3, [x0, #GUEST_DEBUG]
> +	tbz	x3, #KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP_SHIFT, 2f
> +	bl	__setup_debug
> +	b	1f
> +2:
>  	skip_debug_state x3, 1f
>  	bl	__restore_debug
>  1:
> @@ -881,6 +922,11 @@ __kvm_vcpu_return:
>  	bl __save_fpsimd
>  	bl __save_sysregs
>  
> +	// If we are debugging the guest don't save debug registers
> +	// otherwise we'll be trashing are only good copy we have.
                                       ^^ the
> +	ldr	x3, [x0, #GUEST_DEBUG]
> +	tbnz	x3, #KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP_SHIFT, 1f
> +
>  	skip_debug_state x3, 1f
>  	bl	__save_debug

I feel like there should be a more elegant way to merge the selection of
__setup_debug vs. __restore_debug and skip_debug_state.

>  1:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> index 70a7816..0de6caa 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext)
>  	case KVM_CAP_ARM_EL1_32BIT:
>  		r = cpu_has_32bit_el1();
>  		break;
> +	case KVM_CAP_GUEST_DEBUG_HW_BPS:
> +		r = get_num_brps();
> +		break;
> +	case KVM_CAP_GUEST_DEBUG_HW_WPS:
> +		r  = get_num_wrps();
                  ^ extra space here
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		r = 0;
>  	}
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 347e5b0..49a5f97 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -759,6 +759,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
>  #define KVM_CAP_PPC_FIXUP_HCALL 103
>  #define KVM_CAP_PPC_ENABLE_HCALL 104
>  #define KVM_CAP_CHECK_EXTENSION_VM 105
> +#define KVM_CAP_GUEST_DEBUG_HW_BPS 106
> +#define KVM_CAP_GUEST_DEBUG_HW_WPS 107
>  
>  #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>  
> -- 
> 2.1.3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists