[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54753B17.1050308@rock-chips.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:29:43 +0800
From: Roger <roger.chen@...k-chips.com>
To: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, heiko@...ech.de
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, kever.yang@...k-chips.com,
mark.yao@...k-chips.com, eddie.cai@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] GMAC: add driver for Rockchip RK3288 SoCs integrated
GMAC
Hi! Giuseppe CAVALLARO
在 2014/11/25 18:05, Giuseppe CAVALLARO 写道:
> Hello Roger
>
> thx for these patches, my comments inline below
>
> On 11/25/2014 10:07 AM, Roger Chen wrote:
>> This driver is based on stmmac driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Chen <roger.chen@...k-chips.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 629
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c | 3 +
>> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.h | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 634 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile
>> index ac4d562..73c2715 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile
>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ stmmac-objs:= stmmac_main.o stmmac_ethtool.o
>> stmmac_mdio.o ring_mode.o \
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_STMMAC_PLATFORM) += stmmac-platform.o
>> stmmac-platform-objs:= stmmac_platform.o dwmac-meson.o
>> dwmac-sunxi.o \
>> - dwmac-sti.o dwmac-socfpga.o
>> + dwmac-sti.o dwmac-socfpga.o dwmac-rk.o
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_STMMAC_PCI) += stmmac-pci.o
>> stmmac-pci-objs:= stmmac_pci.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..9e50b37
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,629 @@
>> +/**
>> + * dwmac-rk.c - Rockchip RK3288 DWMAC specific glue layer
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Chen-Zhi (Roger Chen)
>> + *
>> + * Chen-Zhi (Roger Chen) <roger.chen@...k-chips.com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>> + * (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/stmmac.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/phy.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_net.h>
>> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>> +
>> +struct rk_priv_data {
>> + struct platform_device *pdev;
>> + int phy_iface;
>> + bool power_ctrl_by_pmu;
>> + char pmu_regulator[32];
>> + int pmu_enable_level;
>> +
>> + int power_io;
>> + int power_io_level;
>> + int reset_io;
>> + int reset_io_level;
>> + int phyirq_io;
>> + int phyirq_io_level;
>> +
>> + bool clk_enabled;
>> + bool clock_input;
>> +
>> + struct clk *clk_mac;
>> + struct clk *clk_mac_pll;
>> + struct clk *gmac_clkin;
>> + struct clk *mac_clk_rx;
>> + struct clk *mac_clk_tx;
>> + struct clk *clk_mac_ref;
>> + struct clk *clk_mac_refout;
>> + struct clk *aclk_mac;
>> + struct clk *pclk_mac;
>> +
>> + int tx_delay;
>> + int rx_delay;
>> +
>> + struct regmap *grf;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1 0x0248
>> +#define RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON3 0x0250
>> +#define RK3288_GRF_GPIO3D_E 0x01ec
>> +#define RK3288_GRF_GPIO4A_E 0x01f0
>> +#define RK3288_GRF_GPIO4B_E 0x01f4
>> +
>> +/*RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1*/
>> +#define GMAC_PHY_INTF_SEL_RGMII ((0x01C0 << 16) | (0x0040))
>> +#define GMAC_PHY_INTF_SEL_RMII ((0x01C0 << 16) | (0x0100))
>> +#define GMAC_FLOW_CTRL ((0x0200 << 16) | (0x0200))
>> +#define GMAC_FLOW_CTRL_CLR ((0x0200 << 16) | (0x0000))
>> +#define GMAC_SPEED_10M ((0x0400 << 16) | (0x0000))
>> +#define GMAC_SPEED_100M ((0x0400 << 16) | (0x0400))
>> +#define GMAC_RMII_CLK_25M ((0x0800 << 16) | (0x0800))
>> +#define GMAC_RMII_CLK_2_5M ((0x0800 << 16) | (0x0000))
>> +#define GMAC_CLK_125M ((0x3000 << 16) | (0x0000))
>> +#define GMAC_CLK_25M ((0x3000 << 16) | (0x3000))
>> +#define GMAC_CLK_2_5M ((0x3000 << 16) | (0x2000))
>> +#define GMAC_RMII_MODE ((0x4000 << 16) | (0x4000))
>> +#define GMAC_RMII_MODE_CLR ((0x4000 << 16) | (0x0000))
>> +
>> +/*RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON3*/
>> +#define GMAC_TXCLK_DLY_ENABLE ((0x4000 << 16) | (0x4000))
>> +#define GMAC_TXCLK_DLY_DISABLE ((0x4000 << 16) | (0x0000))
>> +#define GMAC_RXCLK_DLY_ENABLE ((0x8000 << 16) | (0x8000))
>> +#define GMAC_RXCLK_DLY_DISABLE ((0x8000 << 16) | (0x0000))
>> +#define GMAC_CLK_RX_DL_CFG(val) ((0x3F80 << 16) | (val<<7))
>> +#define GMAC_CLK_TX_DL_CFG(val) ((0x007F << 16) | (val))
>
> why do not use BIT and BIT_MASK where possible?
>
>> +static void set_to_rgmii(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv,
>> + int tx_delay, int rx_delay)
>> +{
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf)) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Missing rockchip,grf property\n", __func__);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
>> + GMAC_PHY_INTF_SEL_RGMII);
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
>> + GMAC_RMII_MODE_CLR);
>
> maybe you could perform just one write unless there is some HW
> constraint.
>
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON3,
>> + GMAC_RXCLK_DLY_ENABLE);
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON3,
>> + GMAC_TXCLK_DLY_ENABLE);
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON3,
>> + GMAC_CLK_RX_DL_CFG(rx_delay));
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON3,
>> + GMAC_CLK_TX_DL_CFG(tx_delay));
>
> ditto
>
>> +
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_GPIO3D_E, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_GPIO4B_E,
>> + 0x3<<2<<16 | 0x3<<2);
>
> pls use macros, these shift sequence is really help to decode
>
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_GPIO4A_E, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>> +
>> + pr_info("%s: tx delay=0x%x; rx delay=0x%x;\n",
>> + __func__, tx_delay, rx_delay);
>
> may I suggest pr_debug?
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void set_to_rmii(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv)
>> +{
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf)) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Missing rockchip,grf property\n", __func__);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
>> + GMAC_PHY_INTF_SEL_RMII);
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
>> + GMAC_RMII_MODE);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void set_rgmii_speed(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, int speed)
>> +{
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf)) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Missing rockchip,grf property\n", __func__);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (speed == 10)
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
>> GMAC_CLK_2_5M);
>> + else if (speed == 100)
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1, GMAC_CLK_25M);
>> + else if (speed == 1000)
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
>> GMAC_CLK_125M);
>> + else
>> + pr_err("unknown speed value for RGMII! speed=%d", speed);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void set_rmii_speed(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, int speed)
>> +{
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf)) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Missing rockchip,grf property\n", __func__);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (speed == 10) {
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
>> + GMAC_RMII_CLK_2_5M);
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
>> + GMAC_SPEED_10M);
>> + } else if (speed == 100) {
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
>> + GMAC_RMII_CLK_25M);
>> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
>> + GMAC_SPEED_100M);
>> + } else {
>> + pr_err("unknown speed value for RMII! speed=%d", speed);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define MAC_CLK_RX "mac_clk_rx"
>> +#define MAC_CLK_TX "mac_clk_tx"
>> +#define CLK_MAC_REF "clk_mac_ref"
>> +#define CLK_MAC_REF_OUT "clk_mac_refout"
>> +#define CLK_MAC_PLL "clk_mac_pll"
>> +#define ACLK_MAC "aclk_mac"
>> +#define PCLK_MAC "pclk_mac"
>> +#define MAC_CLKIN "ext_gmac"
>> +#define CLK_MAC "stmmaceth"
>
> Concerning the clocks, the "stmmaceth" is actually used for the main
> clock so maybe you should use another name.
>
in stmmac_main.c, clk "stmmaceth"(STMMAC_RESOURCE_NAME) is used to be
the source of priv->clk_csr.
priv->stmmac_clk = devm_clk_get(priv->device, STMMAC_RESOURCE_NAME);
so I have to define a kind of clock named "stmmaceth".
> See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/stmmac.txt
>
> For St platforms, it has been used: sti-ethclk but we could
> used a common and better name: stmmac-phyclk
> And I could also propose this change on STi glue-logic.
>
> Then, I think that all the clock macros above should be documented
> and maybe managed at DT level, what do you think?
>
>> +
>> +int gmac_clk_init(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &bsp_priv->pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->clk_enabled = false;
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->mac_clk_rx = clk_get(dev, MAC_CLK_RX);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->mac_clk_rx))
>> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
>> + __func__, MAC_CLK_RX);
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->mac_clk_tx = clk_get(dev, MAC_CLK_TX);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->mac_clk_tx))
>> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
>> + __func__, MAC_CLK_TX);
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_ref = clk_get(dev, CLK_MAC_REF);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_ref))
>> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
>> + __func__, CLK_MAC_REF);
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_refout = clk_get(dev, CLK_MAC_REF_OUT);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_refout))
>> + pr_warn("%s: warning:cannot get clock %s\n",
>> + __func__, CLK_MAC_REF_OUT);
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->aclk_mac = clk_get(dev, ACLK_MAC);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->aclk_mac))
>> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
>> + __func__, ACLK_MAC);
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->pclk_mac = clk_get(dev, PCLK_MAC);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->pclk_mac))
>> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
>> + __func__, PCLK_MAC);
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_pll = clk_get(dev, CLK_MAC_PLL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_pll))
>> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
>> + __func__, CLK_MAC_PLL);
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->gmac_clkin = clk_get(dev, MAC_CLKIN);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->gmac_clkin))
>> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
>> + __func__, MAC_CLKIN);
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->clk_mac = clk_get(dev, CLK_MAC);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac))
>> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
>> + __func__, CLK_MAC);
>> +
>> + if (bsp_priv->clock_input) {
>> + pr_info("%s: clock input from PHY\n", __func__);
>> + } else {
>> + if (bsp_priv->phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII)
>> + clk_set_rate(bsp_priv->clk_mac_pll, 50000000);
>> +
>> + clk_set_parent(bsp_priv->clk_mac, bsp_priv->clk_mac_pll);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int gmac_clk_enable(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + int phy_iface = phy_iface = bsp_priv->phy_iface;
>> +
>> + if (enable) {
>> + if (!bsp_priv->clk_enabled) {
>> + if (phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII) {
>> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->mac_clk_rx))
>> + clk_prepare_enable(
>> + bsp_priv->mac_clk_rx);
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_ref))
>> + clk_prepare_enable(
>> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_ref);
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_refout))
>> + clk_prepare_enable(
>> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_refout);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->aclk_mac))
>> + clk_prepare_enable(bsp_priv->aclk_mac);
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->pclk_mac))
>> + clk_prepare_enable(bsp_priv->pclk_mac);
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->mac_clk_tx))
>> + clk_prepare_enable(bsp_priv->mac_clk_tx);
>> +
>> + /**
>> + * if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac))
>> + * clk_prepare_enable(bsp_priv->clk_mac);
>> + */
>
> why do you need to comment this? could it be related to the stmmaceth
> clk that is used by the main?
>
yes. the same explanation as above
>> + mdelay(5);
>
> hmm, do you actually need this mdelay? Is it to stabilize PLL sources?
>
yes.
>> + bsp_priv->clk_enabled = true;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + if (bsp_priv->clk_enabled) {
>> + if (phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII) {
>> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->mac_clk_rx))
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(
>> + bsp_priv->mac_clk_rx);
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_ref))
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(
>> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_ref);
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_refout))
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(
>> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_refout);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->aclk_mac))
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(bsp_priv->aclk_mac);
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->pclk_mac))
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(bsp_priv->pclk_mac);
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->mac_clk_tx))
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(bsp_priv->mac_clk_tx);
>> + /**
>> + * if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac))
>> + * clk_disable_unprepare(bsp_priv->clk_mac);
>> + */
>> + bsp_priv->clk_enabled = false;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int power_on_by_pmu(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + struct regulator *ldo;
>> + char *ldostr = bsp_priv->pmu_regulator;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!ldostr) {
>> + pr_err("%s: no ldo found\n", __func__);
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ldo = regulator_get(NULL, ldostr);
>> + if (!ldo) {
>> + pr_err("\n%s get ldo %s failed\n", __func__, ldostr);
>> + } else {
>> + if (enable) {
>> + if (!regulator_is_enabled(ldo)) {
>> + regulator_set_voltage(ldo, 3300000, 3300000);
>> + ret = regulator_enable(ldo);
>> + if (ret != 0)
>> + pr_err("%s: fail to enable %s\n",
>> + __func__, ldostr);
>> + else
>> + pr_info("turn on ldo done.\n");
>> + } else {
>> + pr_warn("%s is enabled before enable", ldostr);
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + if (regulator_is_enabled(ldo)) {
>> + ret = regulator_disable(ldo);
>> + if (ret != 0)
>> + pr_err("%s: fail to disable %s\n",
>> + __func__, ldostr);
>> + else
>> + pr_info("turn off ldo done.\n");
>> + } else {
>> + pr_warn("%s is disabled before disable",
>> + ldostr);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + regulator_put(ldo);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int power_on_by_gpio(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + if (enable) {
>> + /*power on*/
>> + if (gpio_is_valid(bsp_priv->power_io))
>> + gpio_direction_output(bsp_priv->power_io,
>> + bsp_priv->power_io_level);
>> + } else {
>> + /*power off*/
>> + if (gpio_is_valid(bsp_priv->power_io))
>> + gpio_direction_output(bsp_priv->power_io,
>> + !bsp_priv->power_io_level);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int phy_power_on(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + int ret = -1;
>> +
>> + pr_info("Ethernet PHY power %s\n", enable == 1 ? "on" : "off");
>> +
>> + if (bsp_priv->power_ctrl_by_pmu)
>> + ret = power_on_by_pmu(bsp_priv, enable);
>> + else
>> + ret = power_on_by_gpio(bsp_priv, enable);
>> +
>> + if (enable) {
>> + /*reset*/
>> + if (gpio_is_valid(bsp_priv->reset_io)) {
>> + gpio_direction_output(bsp_priv->reset_io,
>> + bsp_priv->reset_io_level);
>> + mdelay(5);
>> + gpio_direction_output(bsp_priv->reset_io,
>> + !bsp_priv->reset_io_level);
>> + }
>> + mdelay(30);
>> +
>> + } else {
>> + /*pull down reset*/
>> + if (gpio_is_valid(bsp_priv->reset_io)) {
>> + gpio_direction_output(bsp_priv->reset_io,
>> + bsp_priv->reset_io_level);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define GPIO_PHY_POWER "gmac_phy_power"
>> +#define GPIO_PHY_RESET "gmac_phy_reset"
>> +#define GPIO_PHY_IRQ "gmac_phy_irq"
>> +
>> +static void *rk_gmac_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + enum of_gpio_flags flags;
>> + int ret;
>> + const char *strings = NULL;
>> + int value;
>> + int irq;
>> +
>> + bsp_priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*bsp_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!bsp_priv)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->phy_iface = of_get_phy_mode(dev->of_node);
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "pmu_regulator",
>> &strings);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Can not read property: pmu_regulator.\n",
>> __func__);
>> + bsp_priv->power_ctrl_by_pmu = false;
>> + } else {
>> + pr_info("%s: ethernet phy power controlled by pmu(%s).\n",
>> + __func__, strings);
>> + bsp_priv->power_ctrl_by_pmu = true;
>> + strcpy(bsp_priv->pmu_regulator, strings);
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "pmu_enable_level",
>> &value);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Can not read property: pmu_enable_level.\n",
>> + __func__);
>> + bsp_priv->power_ctrl_by_pmu = false;
>> + } else {
>> + pr_info("%s: PHY power controlled by pmu(level = %s).\n",
>> + __func__, (value == 1) ? "HIGH" : "LOW");
>> + bsp_priv->power_ctrl_by_pmu = true;
>> + bsp_priv->pmu_enable_level = value;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "clock_in_out",
>> &strings);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Can not read property: clock_in_out.\n", __func__);
>> + bsp_priv->clock_input = true;
>> + } else {
>> + pr_info("%s: clock input or output? (%s).\n",
>> + __func__, strings);
>> + if (!strcmp(strings, "input"))
>> + bsp_priv->clock_input = true;
>> + else
>> + bsp_priv->clock_input = false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "tx_delay", &value);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + bsp_priv->tx_delay = 0x30;
>> + pr_err("%s: Can not read property: tx_delay.", __func__);
>> + pr_err("%s: set tx_delay to 0x%x\n",
>> + __func__, bsp_priv->tx_delay);
>> + } else {
>> + pr_info("%s: TX delay(0x%x).\n", __func__, value);
>> + bsp_priv->tx_delay = value;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "rx_delay", &value);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + bsp_priv->rx_delay = 0x10;
>> + pr_err("%s: Can not read property: rx_delay.", __func__);
>> + pr_err("%s: set rx_delay to 0x%x\n",
>> + __func__, bsp_priv->rx_delay);
>> + } else {
>> + pr_info("%s: RX delay(0x%x).\n", __func__, value);
>> + bsp_priv->rx_delay = value;
>> + }
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->grf = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
>> + "rockchip,grf");
>> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf))
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing rockchip,grf property\n");
>
> I wonder if you can fail on here and save all the check in
> set_rgmii_speed etc.
> Maybe this can be considered a mandatory property for the glue-logic.
>
about fail check, you mean "if(IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf))" ?
or all of the return value of of_property_*
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->phyirq_io =
>> + of_get_named_gpio_flags(dev->of_node,
>> + "phyirq-gpio", 0, &flags);
>> + bsp_priv->phyirq_io_level = (flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) ? 0 : 1;
>
>
> Sorry, did you document all in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ ?
>
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->reset_io =
>> + of_get_named_gpio_flags(dev->of_node,
>> + "reset-gpio", 0, &flags);
>> + bsp_priv->reset_io_level = (flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) ? 0 : 1;
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->power_io =
>> + of_get_named_gpio_flags(dev->of_node, "power-gpio", 0, &flags);
>> + bsp_priv->power_io_level = (flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) ? 0 : 1;
>> +
>> + /*power*/
>> + if (!gpio_is_valid(bsp_priv->power_io)) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Failed to get GPIO %s.\n",
>> + __func__, "power-gpio");
>> + } else {
>> + ret = gpio_request(bsp_priv->power_io, GPIO_PHY_POWER);
>> + if (ret)
>> + pr_err("%s: ERROR: Failed to request GPIO %s.\n",
>> + __func__, GPIO_PHY_POWER);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!gpio_is_valid(bsp_priv->reset_io)) {
>> + pr_err("%s: ERROR: Get reset-gpio failed.\n", __func__);
>> + } else {
>> + ret = gpio_request(bsp_priv->reset_io, GPIO_PHY_RESET);
>> + if (ret)
>> + pr_err("%s: ERROR: Failed to request GPIO %s.\n",
>> + __func__, GPIO_PHY_RESET);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (bsp_priv->phyirq_io > 0) {
>> + struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat_dat;
>> +
>> + pr_info("PHY irq in use\n");
>> + ret = gpio_request(bsp_priv->phyirq_io, GPIO_PHY_IRQ);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + pr_warn("%s: Failed to request GPIO %s\n",
>> + __func__, GPIO_PHY_IRQ);
>> + goto goon;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = gpio_direction_input(bsp_priv->phyirq_io);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + pr_err("%s, Failed to set input for GPIO %s\n",
>> + __func__, GPIO_PHY_IRQ);
>> + gpio_free(bsp_priv->phyirq_io);
>> + goto goon;
>> + }
>> +
>> + irq = gpio_to_irq(bsp_priv->phyirq_io);
>> + if (irq < 0) {
>> + ret = irq;
>> + pr_err("Failed to set irq for %s\n",
>> + GPIO_PHY_IRQ);
>> + gpio_free(bsp_priv->phyirq_io);
>> + goto goon;
>> + }
>> +
>> + plat_dat = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>> + if (plat_dat)
>> + plat_dat->mdio_bus_data->probed_phy_irq = irq;
>> + else
>> + pr_err("%s: plat_data is NULL\n", __func__);
>> + }
>> +
>> +goon:
>> + /*rmii or rgmii*/
>> + if (bsp_priv->phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII) {
>> + pr_info("%s: init for RGMII\n", __func__);
>> + set_to_rgmii(bsp_priv, bsp_priv->tx_delay, bsp_priv->rx_delay);
>> + } else if (bsp_priv->phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII) {
>> + pr_info("%s: init for RMII\n", __func__);
>> + set_to_rmii(bsp_priv);
>> + } else {
>> + pr_err("%s: ERROR: NO interface defined!\n", __func__);
>> + }
>> +
>> + bsp_priv->pdev = pdev;
>> +
>> + gmac_clk_init(bsp_priv);
>> +
>> + return bsp_priv;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rk_gmac_init(struct platform_device *pdev, void *priv)
>> +{
>> + struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv = priv;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = phy_power_on(bsp_priv, true);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = gmac_clk_enable(bsp_priv, true);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void rk_gmac_exit(struct platform_device *pdev, void *priv)
>> +{
>> + struct rk_priv_data *gmac = priv;
>> +
>> + phy_power_on(gmac, false);
>> + gmac_clk_enable(gmac, false);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void rk_fix_speed(void *priv, unsigned int speed)
>> +{
>> + struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv = priv;
>> +
>> + if (bsp_priv->phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII)
>> + set_rgmii_speed(bsp_priv, speed);
>> + else if (bsp_priv->phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII)
>> + set_rmii_speed(bsp_priv, speed);
>> + else
>> + pr_err("unsupported interface %d", bsp_priv->phy_iface);
>> +}
>> +
>> +const struct stmmac_of_data rk_gmac_data = {
>> + .has_gmac = 1,
>> + .tx_coe = 1,
>
> FYI, on new gmac there is the HW capability register to dinamically
> provide you if coe is supported.
>
> IMO you should add the OF "compatible" string and in case of mac
> newer than the 3.50a you can remove coe.
>
>
> BR
> Peppe
>
>> + .fix_mac_speed = rk_fix_speed,
>> + .setup = rk_gmac_setup,
>> + .init = rk_gmac_init,
>> + .exit = rk_gmac_exit,
>> +};
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
>> index 15814b7..b4dee96 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id stmmac_dt_ids[] = {
>> /* SoC specific glue layers should come before generic bindings */
>> + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-gmac", .data = &rk_gmac_data},
>> { .compatible = "amlogic,meson6-dwmac", .data =
>> &meson6_dwmac_data},
>> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-gmac", .data =
>> &sun7i_gmac_data},
>> { .compatible = "st,stih415-dwmac", .data = &stih4xx_dwmac_data},
>> @@ -291,6 +292,8 @@ static int stmmac_pltfr_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>>
>> + pdev->dev.platform_data = plat_dat;
>> +
>> ret = stmmac_probe_config_dt(pdev, plat_dat, &mac);
>> if (ret) {
>> pr_err("%s: main dt probe failed", __func__);
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.h
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.h
>> index 25dd1f7..32a0516 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.h
>> @@ -24,5 +24,6 @@ extern const struct stmmac_of_data sun7i_gmac_data;
>> extern const struct stmmac_of_data stih4xx_dwmac_data;
>> extern const struct stmmac_of_data stid127_dwmac_data;
>> extern const struct stmmac_of_data socfpga_gmac_data;
>> +extern const struct stmmac_of_data rk_gmac_data;
>>
>> #endif /* __STMMAC_PLATFORM_H__ */
>>
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists