lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:29:14 +0100
From:	Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC:	Mihai Donțu <mihai.dontu@...il.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	<pgynther@...gle.com>, <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	<linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bluetooth related firmware loader spew on resume.

On 11/27/14 10:17, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:59:12 +0100,
> Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>
>> On 11/26/14 19:13, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>> At Wed, 26 Nov 2014 18:42:46 +0100,
>>> Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/26/14 16:27, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>>>> At Wed, 26 Nov 2014 17:26:15 +0200,
>>>>> Mihai Donțu wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:19:49 +0100
>>>>>> Takashi Iwai<tiwai@...e.de>    wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:56:09 +0200,
>>>>>>> Mihai Donțu wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:12:28 -0500 Dave Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Since the addition of 10d4c6736ea "Bluetooth: btusb: Add Broadcom patch
>>>>>>>>> RAM support", I (and a number of other people[*]) have been seeing
>>>>>>>>> this trace on resume from suspend.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 8565 at drivers/base/firmware_class.c:1127 _request_firmware+0x4c1/0x7c0()
>>>>>>>>> CPU: 1 PID: 8565 Comm: kworker/u17:0 Not tainted 3.17.2-200.fc20.x86_64 #1
>>>>>>>>> Hardware name: LENOVO 2356JK8/2356JK8, BIOS G7ET94WW (2.54 ) 04/30/2013
>>>>>>>>> Workqueue: hci0 hci_power_on [bluetooth]
>>>>>>>>> 0000000000000000 00000000f52a564b ffff8800a8c63be8 ffffffff817271cc
>>>>>>>>> 0000000000000000 ffff8800a8c63c20 ffffffff81094ced ffff8800a8c63d10
>>>>>>>>> ffff8801365ddf00 ffff8801387b4b00 ffff8800a8c63d08 00000000fffffff5
>>>>>>>>> Call Trace:
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff817271cc>] dump_stack+0x45/0x56
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff81094ced>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff81094e1a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff814965c1>] _request_firmware+0x4c1/0x7c0
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff8137b9b9>] ? snprintf+0x49/0x70
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff814968f1>] request_firmware+0x31/0x50
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffffa0943bf3>] btusb_setup_bcm_patchram+0x83/0x550 [btusb]
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff8148ecf6>] ? rpm_idle+0xd6/0x2b0
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffffa0649051>] hci_dev_do_open+0xe1/0xa60 [bluetooth]
>>>>>>>>> ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT1: docking
>>>>>>>>> Restarting tasks ...
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff810bcb3d>] ? ttwu_do_activate.constprop.90+0x5d/0x70
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffffa064a1c0>] hci_power_on+0x40/0x1e0 [bluetooth]
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff810f53fb>] ? lock_timer_base.isra.34+0x2b/0x50
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff810acc39>] process_one_work+0x149/0x3d0
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff810ad2bb>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x490
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff810ad1a0>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2e0/0x2e0
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff810b2318>] kthread+0xd8/0xf0
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff810b2240>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x190/0x190
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff8172e7bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
>>>>>>>>> [<ffffffff810b2240>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x190/0x190
>>>>>>>>> ---[ end trace 75a0e9c7f33ebb4c ]---
>>>>>>>>> bluetooth hci0: firmware: brcm/BCM20702A0-0a5c-21e6.hcd will not be loaded
>>>>>>>>> Bluetooth: hci0: BCM: patch brcm/BCM20702A0-0a5c-21e6.hcd not found
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At first I thought it was just over-reaction to the file being missing, but
>>>>>>>>> looking at the WARN_ON, it appears that we're trying to invoke the firmware
>>>>>>>>> loader before userspace is back up ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In this (and probably other related) kernel, CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER is unset,
>>>>>>>>> in case that matters at all.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 	Dave
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [*] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81821
>>>>>>>>>        https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133378
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have the following during normal boot:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [    5.620796] Bluetooth: hci0: read Intel version: 370710018002030d00
>>>>>>>> [    5.620822] bluetooth hci0: Direct firmware load for intel/ibt-hw-37.7.10-fw-1.80.2.3.d.bseq failed with error -2
>>>>>>>> [    5.620827] Bluetooth: hci0 failed to open Intel firmware file: intel/ibt-hw-37.7.10-fw-1.80.2.3.d.bseq(-2)
>>>>>>>> [    5.620920] bluetooth hci0: Direct firmware load for intel/ibt-hw-37.7.bseq failed with error -2
>>>>>>>> [    5.620922] Bluetooth: hci0 failed to open default Intel fw file: intel/ibt-hw-37.7.bseq
>>>>>>>> [    5.629910] EXT4-fs (sda2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
>>>>>>>> [    5.629916] VFS: Mounted root (ext4 filesystem) readonly on device 8:2.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The driver is trying to load the firmware before root is mounted. Do I
>>>>>>>> really need an initramfs?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If btusb driver is loaded in initrd, you'd need the corresponding
>>>>>>> firmware in initrd, too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The driver is built into the kernel and I don't use an initrd. I could
>>>>>> probably create one, but it's a bit tricky with UEFI and a tad harder
>>>>>> to maintain.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then you can build the firmware file into kernel, too.
>>>>
>>>> huh? The whole idea of the firmware API was to keep (often proprietary)
>>>> firmware out of the kernel. Has that strategy been abandoned recently?
>>>
>>> See CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMARE.  It doesn't mean to include the binary blob
>>> into the kernel source tree.  It just allows to *build* into your
>>> kernel.
>>
>> I see. Thanks for the info. I still do not understand the resume
>> scenario. I though firmware api did some sort of caching of the firmware
>> images.
>
> My theory is that this is triggered when the firmware file doesn't
> exist.  Then it's neither remembered nor cached, so it's retried in
> the resume path.  But the information is missing, so I cannot say
> surely about it.

Agree. So the same warning should have occurred upon system boot. Maybe 
Mihai can confirm that.

Regards,
Arend

>
> Takashi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ