[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F792CF86EFE20D4AB8064279AFBA51C613E646F7@HKNPRD3002MB017.064d.mgd.msft.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:44:17 +0000
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
CC: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org"
<driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] hv: hv_fcopy: drop the obsolete message on transfer
failure
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@...hat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 17:01 PM
> To: Dexuan Cui
> Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; driverdev-
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; olaf@...fle.de; apw@...onical.com; KY
> Srinivasan; vkuznets@...hat.com; Haiyang Zhang
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] hv: hv_fcopy: drop the obsolete message on transfer
> failure
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@...hat.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 15:15 PM
> >> To: Dexuan Cui
> >> Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> >> driverdev-
> >> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; olaf@...fle.de; apw@...onical.com; KY
> >> Srinivasan; vkuznets@...hat.com; Haiyang Zhang
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hv: hv_fcopy: drop the obsolete message on
> >> transfer
> >> failure
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> > In the case the user-space daemon crashes, hangs or is killed, we
> >> > need to down the semaphore, otherwise, after the daemon starts
> >> next
> >> > time, the obsolete data in fcopy_transaction.message or
> >> > fcopy_transaction.fcopy_msg will be used immediately.
> >> >
> >> > Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> >> > Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >
> >> > v2: I removed the "FCP" prefix as Greg asked.
> >> >
> >> > I also updated the output message a little:
> >> > "FCP: failed to acquire the semaphore" -->
> >> > "can not acquire the semaphore: it is benign"
> >> >
> >> > drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c | 9 +++++++++
> >> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c b/drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c
> >> > index 23b2ce2..c518ad9 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c
> >> > @@ -86,6 +86,15 @@ static void fcopy_work_func(struct work_struct
> >> *dummy)
> >> > * process the pending transaction.
> >> > */
> >> > fcopy_respond_to_host(HV_E_FAIL);
> >> > +
> >> > + /* In the case the user-space daemon crashes, hangs or is
> >> killed, we
> >> > + * need to down the semaphore, otherwise, after the daemon
> >> starts
> >> next
> >> > + * time, the obsolete data in fcopy_transaction.message or
> >> > + * fcopy_transaction.fcopy_msg will be used immediately.
> >> > + */
> >>
> >> Looks still racy, what happens if the daemon start before
> >> down_trylock()
> >> but after fcopy_respont_to_host() here?
> > Jason,
> > Thanks for pointing this out!
> > IMO we can resolve this by adding down_trylock() in fcopy_release().
> > What's your opinion?
>
>
> Looks better and need to cancel the timeout also here?
OK, let me post a v3.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> > + if (down_trylock(&fcopy_transaction.read_sema))
> >> > + pr_debug("can not acquire the semaphore: it is benign\n");
> >>
> >> typo
> >> > +
> >> > }
> > Sorry -- what typo do you mean?
>
> s/benign/begin/ ?
I meant the issue(can't get the semaphore) is benign.
I think we can just remove the message, as KY suggested.
Instead, I'll add a comment for it.
Thanks,
-- Dexuan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists