linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/19] pinctrl: exynos: Add support for Exynos5433

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4132795.KBVIQFTevx@wuerfel>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:36:36 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Cc:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	InKi Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
	Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>,
	geunsik.lim@...sung.com, "sw0312.kim" <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
	Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@...sung.com>,
	devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/19] pinctrl: exynos: Add support for Exynos5433

On Thursday 27 November 2014 21:14:59 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > my impression is that with the
> > move to arm64, you should come up with a new binding that can fully
> > describe each controller so you don't have to add new code and bindings
> > for each future SoC that uses the same scheme.
> 
> Still, this is exactly the same thing I thought when initially refactoring this
> driver 2 years ago and what was dismissed at that time due to people
> supposedly not wanting that much data in DT. If this point of view has changed,
> then I fully support your view, though.

I guess people were at the time underestimating the rate at which Samsung
comes out with new SoC variants that are all slightly different.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/