linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: ARM: Fix the Generic Timers interrupt active level description

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:43:38 +0000
From:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC:	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: ARM: Fix the Generic Timers interrupt active level
 description

On 27/11/14 14:36, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> The Cortex-A5x TRM states in paragraph "9.2 Generic Timer functional
> description" that generic timers provide an active-LOW interrupt
> output. Fix the device trees to correctly describe this.
> 
> While doing this update the CPU mask to match the number of described
> CPUs as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
> ---
> 
> Arnd, Olof: This is on top of linux-next/master as it patches the Juno
> as well as all the other ARM DTs.
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dts  | 8 ++++----
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts           | 8 ++++----
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts | 8 ++++----
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dts
> index 4a06090..27f3296 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dts
> @@ -78,10 +78,10 @@
>  
>  	timer {
>  		compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> -		interrupts = <1 13 0xff01>,
> -			     <1 14 0xff01>,
> -			     <1 11 0xff01>,
> -			     <1 10 0xff01>;
> +		interrupts = <1 13 0xf08>,
> +			     <1 14 0xf08>,
> +			     <1 11 0xf08>,
> +			     <1 10 0xf08>;
>  		clock-frequency = <100000000>;
>  	};
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts
> index 097ecc4..cb3073e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts
> @@ -98,10 +98,10 @@
>  
>  	timer {
>  		compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> -		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>,
> -			     <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>,
> -			     <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>,
> -			     <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>;
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
>  	};
>  
>  	pmu {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts
> index 572005e..efc59b3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts
> @@ -81,10 +81,10 @@
>  
>  	timer {
>  		compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> -		interrupts = <1 13 0xff01>,
> -			     <1 14 0xff01>,
> -			     <1 11 0xff01>,
> -			     <1 10 0xff01>;
> +		interrupts = <1 13 0xf08>,
> +			     <1 14 0xf08>,
> +			     <1 11 0xf08>,
> +			     <1 10 0xf08>;
>  		clock-frequency = <100000000>;
>  	};
>  
> 

Sorry, but that's wrong. Despite the *cores* having an level-low output,
the GIC only triggers on *level-high*. Yes, there is probably an
inverter in between.

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/