[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37310416.jZXoh5nfSC@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 01:37:13 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Use CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME in core code
Hi,
After commit b2b49ccbdd54 "PM: Kconfig: Set PM_RUNTIME if PM_SLEEP is
selected" (currently in Linux next) CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is set whenever
CONFIG_PM is set, so CONFIG_PM can be used in #ifdefs instead of
CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME which simplifies things in quite a few cases.
For this reason, the following patches modify some core code to use
CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME.
[1/4] Drop a macro which is redundant after the above commit.
[2/4] Use PM instead of PM_RUNTIME in the core device PM code.
[3/4] Use PM instead of PM_RUNTIME in the ACPI core.
[4/4] Use PM instead of PM_RUNTIME in the PCI core.
They build for me for all of the relevant combinations of options (on x86),
but more testing (on the other architectures) would be welcome.
Thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists