[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141127162834.GA1404@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 08:28:34 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Mariusz Gorski <marius.gorski@...il.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] staging: panel: Use defined value or checking
module params state
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:14:06PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:57:06AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > And the reason I got confused was because you didn't label your second
> > set of patches "v2", which it was, I saw two separate series, one with a
> > few patches, and then 2 sets of 9, the second set labeled "v2" so I
> > thought they were independant. Please think of the poor maintainer who
> > has to decipher things like this when you send them out...
>
> For Mariusz's defense, this was his first batch. He didn't feel comfortable
> and asked me how to proceed when sending a series and I forgot to warn him
> about the "v2" as initially I didn't think there would be a v2, and after I
> obviously forgot I didn't speak about that. So I share some responsibility
> for this one.
I wasn't trying to make anyone feel bad here, just trying to explain why
I got this all messed up on my end. Mariusz, consider this a chance to
learn how to rebase your patches, a very common task for kernel
developers to have to do :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists