lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141127163059.GZ7712@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:30:59 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...inux.com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] spi: st: Provide Device Tree binding documentation

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 02:55:42PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Mark Brown wrote:

> > What do the two different compatible strings mean (for example, should
> > ssc4 be used for version 4 and higher or is it just a quirk for that
> > version)?

> This appears to be historical.  There aren't any functional
> differences i.e. we don't match on them.  I believe the former is a
> more informal, generic name and the latter is the official name of the
> IP block.  The I2C component already upstreamed has the same naming
> conventions by the looks of it.

Probably best to say something or retire one then.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ