[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141127163059.GZ7712@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:30:59 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] spi: st: Provide Device Tree binding documentation
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 02:55:42PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What do the two different compatible strings mean (for example, should
> > ssc4 be used for version 4 and higher or is it just a quirk for that
> > version)?
> This appears to be historical. There aren't any functional
> differences i.e. we don't match on them. I believe the former is a
> more informal, generic name and the latter is the official name of the
> IP block. The I2C component already upstreamed has the same naming
> conventions by the looks of it.
Probably best to say something or retire one then.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists