[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1411271908590.2571@hadrien>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 19:13:10 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
cc: Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>,
Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Ike Panhc <ike.pan@...onical.com>,
Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>,
Mattia Dongili <malattia@...ux.it>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] platform: x86: Deletion of checks before
backlight_device_unregister()
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> >
> > What script was used ?
>
> A semantic patch approach which I published on the mailing lists in March
> is in action on my software development system for a while.
>
>
> > Is it in scripts/coccinelle ?
>
> Not yet.
>
> I hope that the involved update suggestions got sufficient positive feedback
> to integrate five scripts there.
The current scripts are very complicated, involving the interaction
between multiple scripts and a database, and I think they are not very
suitable for make coccicheck. Also, the idea of removing the null checks
is not appropriate in all contexts. Perhaps it could be possible to add
a script to the Linux kernel that handles a number of common cases for
which removing the null test is widely considered to be desirable.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists