lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 23:30:12 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, zheng.z.yan@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org, eranian@...gle.com Subject: Re: perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Haswell-EP uncore support On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > I'm wondering if these should be just wrmsr's instead of wrmsrl's. > > > > > > Can we just shut up coverity please? > > > > I can manually dismiss them, I don't think the checker has the > > information to determine this for itself. > > I suspect my out of line MSR patchkit would fix the warning > as a side effect, because there would be a function call > inbetween and the function always gets full u64. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/10/376 > > So far it hasn't been reviewed. I'll keep reposting. And if you do so, can you please add a proper 0/n cover letter which explains the scope of the series. I'm tired of wading through N patches to figure out whether this is something I should care of or not. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists