[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141127230349.GA25075@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:03:49 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] oom && coredump
On 11/27, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> So I think the patch below makes sense anyway. Although I should probably
> split it and remove PT_TRACE_EXIT in 2/2.
So let me send the patches.
David, Michal, could you review and ack/nack these changes explicitly?
Let me repeat once again that this patch doesn't pretend to solve
all problems, even with the coredumping. And I have to admit that
my main motivation is 2/2, this PT_TRACE_EXIT check annoys me ;)
Oleg.
mm/oom_kill.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists