[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1417157243.3268.1@smtp.corp.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 06:55:23 +0008
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org, olaf@...fle.de,
apw@...onical.com, kys@...rosoft.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
haiyangz@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] hv: hv_fcopy: drop the obsolete message on transfer
failure
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> In the case the user-space daemon crashes, hangs or is killed, we
> need to down the semaphore, otherwise, after the daemon starts next
> time, the obsolete data in fcopy_transaction.message or
> fcopy_transaction.fcopy_msg will be used immediately.
>
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> ---
>
> v2: I removed the "FCP" prefix as Greg asked.
>
> I also updated the output message a little:
> "FCP: failed to acquire the semaphore" -->
> "can not acquire the semaphore: it is benign"
>
> v3: I added the code in fcopy_release() as Jason Wang suggested.
> I removed the pr_debug (it isn't so meaningful)and added a
> comment instead.
>
> drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c b/drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c
> index 23b2ce2..faa6ba6 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_fcopy.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,18 @@ static void fcopy_work_func(struct work_struct
> *dummy)
> * process the pending transaction.
> */
> fcopy_respond_to_host(HV_E_FAIL);
> +
> + /* In the case the user-space daemon crashes, hangs or is killed, we
> + * need to down the semaphore, otherwise, after the daemon starts
> next
> + * time, the obsolete data in fcopy_transaction.message or
> + * fcopy_transaction.fcopy_msg will be used immediately.
> + *
> + * NOTE: fcopy_read() happens to get the semaphore (very rare)?
> We're
> + * still OK, because we've reported the failure to the host.
> + */
> + if (down_trylock(&fcopy_transaction.read_sema))
> + ;
Sorry, I'm not quite understand how if () ; can help here.
Btw, a question not relate to this patch.
What happens if a daemon is resume from SIGSTOP and expires the check
here?
>
> +
> }
>
> static int fcopy_handle_handshake(u32 version)
> @@ -351,6 +363,13 @@ static int fcopy_release(struct inode *inode,
> struct file *f)
> */
> in_hand_shake = true;
> opened = false;
> +
> + if (cancel_delayed_work_sync(&fcopy_work)) {
> + /* We haven't up()-ed the semaphore(very rare)? */
> + if (down_trylock(&fcopy_transaction.read_sema))
> + ;
And this.
>
> + fcopy_respond_to_host(HV_E_FAIL);
> + }
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists