linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Drivers:Staging:rtl8188eu:hal:usb_halinit.c: Added blank line after declarations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Nov 2014 12:56:56 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Anjana Sasindran <anjanasasindran123@...il.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drivers:Staging:rtl8188eu:hal:usb_halinit.c: Added blank
 line after declarations

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 08:13:03PM +0530, Anjana Sasindran wrote:
>     This patch fixes the five checkpatch.pl warnings:
> 
>     WARNING:Missing a blank line after declaration
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anjana Sasindran <anjanasasindran123@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c
> index 14650e9..439828c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c
> @@ -1931,6 +1931,7 @@ GetHalDefVar8188EUsb(
>  	case HW_DEF_RA_INFO_DUMP:
>  		{
>  			u8 entry_id = *((u8 *)pValue);
> +
>  			if (check_fwstate(&Adapter->mlmepriv, _FW_LINKED)) {
>  				DBG_88E("============ RA status check ===================\n");
>  				DBG_88E("Mac_id:%d , RateID = %d, RAUseRate = 0x%08x, RateSGI = %d, DecisionRate = 0x%02x ,PTStage = %d\n",
> @@ -1946,6 +1947,7 @@ GetHalDefVar8188EUsb(
>  	case HW_DEF_ODM_DBG_FLAG:
>  		{
>  			struct odm_dm_struct *dm_ocm = &(haldata->odmpriv);
> +
>  			pr_info("dm_ocm->DebugComponents = 0x%llx\n", dm_ocm->DebugComponents);
>  		}
>  		break;
> @@ -1994,6 +1996,7 @@ static u8 SetHalDefVar8188EUsb(struct adapter *Adapter, enum hal_def_variable eV
>  			} else if (dm_func == 6) {/* turn on all dynamic func */
>  				if (!(podmpriv->SupportAbility  & DYNAMIC_BB_DIG)) {
>  					struct rtw_dig *pDigTable = &podmpriv->DM_DigTable;
> +
>  					pDigTable->CurIGValue = usb_read8(Adapter, 0xc50);
>  				}
>  				podmpriv->SupportAbility = DYNAMIC_ALL_FUNC_ENABLE;
> @@ -2011,6 +2014,7 @@ static u8 SetHalDefVar8188EUsb(struct adapter *Adapter, enum hal_def_variable eV
>  		{
>  			u8 bRSSIDump = *((u8 *)pValue);
>  			struct odm_dm_struct *dm_ocm = &(haldata->odmpriv);
> +
>  			if (bRSSIDump)
>  				dm_ocm->DebugComponents	=	ODM_COMP_DIG|ODM_COMP_FA_CNT;
>  			else
> @@ -2021,7 +2025,9 @@ static u8 SetHalDefVar8188EUsb(struct adapter *Adapter, enum hal_def_variable eV
>  		{
>  			u64	DebugComponents = *((u64 *)pValue);
>  			struct odm_dm_struct *dm_ocm = &(haldata->odmpriv);
> +
>  			dm_ocm->DebugComponents = DebugComponents;
> +
any reason to give this blank line here? This is not a declaration.

thanks
sudip
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/