[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1417168170.17201.4.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:49:30 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Kumar P, Mahesh" <mahesh.kumar.p@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] x86: pmc_atom: don't check for NULL twice
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 12:36 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > debugfs_remove_recursive() is NULL-aware, thus, we may safely remove the check
> > here. There is no need to assing NULL to variable since it will be not used
> > anywhere.
Thanks for review, my comments below.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/pmc_atom.c | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pmc_atom.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pmc_atom.c
> > index 19b8efa..bcc91ea 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pmc_atom.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pmc_atom.c
> > @@ -202,11 +202,7 @@ static const struct file_operations pmc_sleep_tmr_ops = {
> >
> > static void pmc_dbgfs_unregister(struct pmc_dev *pmc)
> > {
> > - if (!pmc->dbgfs_dir)
> > - return;
> > -
> > debugfs_remove_recursive(pmc->dbgfs_dir);
> > - pmc->dbgfs_dir = NULL;
> > }
>
> So while the patch is correct per se, the whole function is useless.
>
> pmc_dbgfs_register()
>
> dir = debugfs_create_dir("pmc_atom", NULL);
>
> ....
> if (!f)
> goto err;
>
> pmc->dbgfs_dir = dir;
> return 0;
> err:
> pmc_dbgfs_unregister(pmc);
>
> So pmc->dbgfs_dir is always NULL when this is called....
Good catch, I add a new patch to address this.
> Aside of that, if DEBUGFS=n the code keeps pmc->regmap ioremapped for
> no reason.
pmc_hw_reg_setup() uses it. Aubrey, is it intended behaviour?
> Looking deeper:
>
> The pmc_power_off function is installed _BEFORE_ pmc_hw_reg_setup() is
> called, which might not be called if the ioremap fails ....
I don't see any problem here (pmc_power_off uses acpi_base_addr which is
independent to IO mapped space), though Aubrey may shed a light on this.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists