[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54783A2F.5010405@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 09:02:39 +0000
From: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@....com>
To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: i2c: tda998x: Retry fetching the EDID if it fails
first time.
On 11/28/14 08:19, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:41:26 +0000
> Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@....com> wrote:
>
>> Fetching the EDID from a connected monitor is an automated thing
>> with NXP TDA19988. But on some boards the fetching fails for the
>> first time silently without any indication that an error has occured.
>> More than that, subsequent fetches of the EDID succeed until the
>> monitor(s) are unplugged.
>>
>> Add a function to validate the read EDID and retry if the block
>> retrieved is not valid.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
>
> It seems that your patch is deprecated by Laurent Pinchart's
> [PATCH] drm: tda998x: Use drm_do_get_edid()
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-November/072906.html
>
Thank you for the heads-up, I'd not seen that. I'll consider how my patch might be modified to suit the new infrastructure.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists