linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI / video: check _DOD list when creating backlight device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141128095928.GA5106@norris-Latitude-E6410>
Date:	Fri, 28 Nov 2014 01:59:28 -0800
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, ntrrgc@...il.com,
	ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / video: check _DOD list when creating backlight
 device

On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 04:27:55PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 10/01/2014 04:18 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 02:10:17 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
> >> The _DOD method lists which video output device is currently attached so
> >> we should only care about them and ignore others. An user recently
> >> reported that there are two acpi_video interfaces appeared on his system
> >> and one of them doesn't work. From the acpidump, it is found that there
> >> are more than one video output devices that have _BCM control method but
> >> the _DOD lists only one of them. So this patch checks if the video output
> >> device is in the _DOD list and will not create backlight device if it is
> >> not in the list. Also, we consider the broken _DOD case(reflected by the
> >> video->attached_count is 0) and do not change behaviour for those broken
> >> _DOD systems.
> >>
> >> Buglink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84111
> >> Reported-and-tested-by: ntrrgc@...il.com
> >> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
> > 
> > This looks reasonable to me, but I'm a little afraid that it may break
> > systems which forget to list valid interfaces in the _DOD.
> 
> Indeed, this is possible.

And indeed, there is a regression! My Dell Latituded E6410's backlight
control no longer works after this commit, and I get messages like this
instead:

[   57.214610] ACPI: Failed to switch the brightness

If I revert this commit, my backlight controls work again. Also, I
regain a cooling device (?) that was being ignored:

[    1.332682] acpi device:02: registered as cooling_device0

Do you need any additional info to handle the regression, or should we
just revert the patch?

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/